There is a bright side to all this discussion of electronic errors in the grantor/grantee index. There has been much discussion on this board about the short comings of thin title plants, on line systems and electronic indexing in general. Perhaps these errors could serve as case studies reinforcing the value of the independent abstractor. It may be a good idea to catalogue the errors and lack of official effort to correct them for use in any marketing campaign the SOT is considering
in the future.
to post a reply:
login - or -
register