I have to agree with Barb and Judy on this one. The only time I would go backwards on searches is for divorce, probate or assumptions noted in deeds. Otherwise, the person would have to order a 2 owner search. I don't know if one of the three things above were the reason of why a 2-owner was performed. If it was, then yes I would have to agree that it should have been performed because in these three cases it automatically becomes part of the current owner search. I guess not knowing exactly what happened, I cannot truly comment on the situation.
to post a reply:
login - or -
register