Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



More volume for less money does it really make sense - Joe Kalmon
2/17/2004 11:07:04 PM (1333 views)
Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - Loretta Reed
2/18/2004 8:17:27 AM (1842 views)
Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - Smitty Strickland
2/18/2004 10:04:25 AM (1851 views)
Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - Barbara Bennett
2/19/2004 12:37:23 AM (1790 views)
Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - Robert Franco
2/19/2004 10:43:06 AM (1762 views)

This is en EXCELLET topic for this forum, and I am very glad to see people sharing their opinions. One important thing to remember is that price varies by region... for this reason, we are planning to add the state you are in to the message posts.

For instance, we charge $45.00 (plus copies) for a current owner and we are at the top of the fee scale for this region. Many people here are doing current owners for $35-$40. I lost one VERY LARGE client last year to another abstractor who is doing them for $32.00! I refuse to lower my prices for the same reasons that have been discussed, but there are always people out there that are willing to do them for less.

I would love to be able to charge $75 for a current owner, but there are so many people here doing them for $40.00 that I would be out of business tomorrow if I tried. I don't have a problem being at the top of the fee scale, we provide a very high quality product and a quick turn-aroud time, but I still have to be competitive with the local market.

I DO think that some of our clients are lowering their fees. There seems to be a lot more clients now than there were a few years ago and I think they are going through the same thing we are. Some of them are being forced to lower their prices to compete in their markets. I think the reason we are asked to lower prices is so they can undercut their competition. The problem is that they bid the jobs lower and then try to put us in a position to lower our prices to maintain the same overhead... thus we are the ones that really lose out.

My theory on this is why should I help one of my clients undercut another one that is willing to pay my full fee. They keep saying that it is due to the volume, but if they don't get their "new customer" one of my other clients probably will. Joe is absolutely right, "Lets face it price reductions is the beginning of the end." Once our clients get into a price war, they will all have no choice but ask us to reduce our fees. We need to help our good clients, by not helping their competition undercut them.

Just my $0.02.
Robert A. Franco

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - Smitty Strickland
2/19/2004 8:04:39 PM (1847 views)
Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - Scott Perry
2/19/2004 8:55:36 PM (1840 views)
Re: More volume for less money does it really make sense - ss
2/21/2004 1:07:20 AM (1807 views)
Bush? no thanks - Slade Smith
2/21/2004 4:05:10 PM (1780 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Loretta Reed
2/21/2004 6:02:40 PM (1785 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - James Toney
2/22/2004 4:57:39 PM (1761 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Bill Elliott
2/22/2004 7:05:48 PM (1765 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Jan Forster
2/22/2004 11:28:42 PM (1796 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Slade Smith
2/23/2004 2:07:51 AM (1810 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - ss
2/24/2004 10:45:59 PM (1732 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Scott Perry
3/1/2004 10:45:11 PM (1699 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Slade Smith
3/2/2004 10:54:24 PM (1721 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Scott Perry
3/4/2004 9:30:46 PM (1748 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - CHRISTINA GUBANISH
3/4/2004 3:02:49 PM (1758 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - monica froese
3/4/2004 6:55:49 PM (1693 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Scott Perry
3/4/2004 9:19:34 PM (1732 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - monica froese
3/4/2004 9:40:31 PM (1723 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Scott Perry
3/4/2004 9:48:36 PM (1711 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - CHRISTINA GUBANISH
3/18/2004 1:00:42 PM (1738 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Helene Gonzalez
3/5/2004 10:58:44 PM (1701 views)
Re: Bush? no thanks - Helene Gonzalez
3/5/2004 11:05:03 PM (1746 views)
Bush? YES! - Jan Forster
3/6/2004 11:11:49 AM (1679 views)
Bush? YES! - Jay Duncan
3/8/2004 12:29:39 AM (1740 views)
Re: Bush? YES! - Helene Gonzalez
3/18/2004 11:01:45 PM (1692 views)

Infinity Information - Michael Finley
2/17/2004 9:32:10 PM (1320 views)
Re: Infinity Information - David Bloys
2/17/2004 10:53:16 PM (1861 views)
Re: Infinity Information - Loretta Reed
2/17/2004 10:54:08 PM (1721 views)
Re: Infinity Information - Michael Finley
2/18/2004 7:32:44 AM (1833 views)

Easy Way to find Quotes for Title Insurance - david strause
2/17/2004 12:41:42 PM (964 views)

Nations Title Memo - Jan Forster
2/16/2004 9:06:42 PM (1356 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Loretta Reed
2/16/2004 10:00:18 PM (1797 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Shannon Blatt
2/17/2004 1:11:36 AM (1757 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Loretta Reed
2/17/2004 8:26:42 AM (1694 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Teresa Beeman
2/17/2004 11:04:26 AM (1792 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Jan Forster
2/17/2004 12:28:11 PM (1816 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Smitty Strickland
2/17/2004 7:43:40 PM (1760 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Scott Perry
2/19/2004 8:38:00 PM (1670 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - ss
2/21/2004 2:01:17 AM (1616 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - Scott Perry
2/23/2004 8:46:53 PM (1635 views)
Re: Nations Title Memo - ss
2/24/2004 9:27:29 PM (1524 views)

New E-mail address - Jay Duncan
2/11/2004 7:21:16 PM (1028 views)




Consumer Direct - Jay Duncan
2/11/2004 7:16:35 PM (1309 views)
Re: Consumer Direct - Cherie Smurthwaite
2/20/2004 12:52:08 PM (1592 views)

Title Abstracting online - Angelica DelliCarpini
2/11/2004 7:03:51 PM (1157 views)

Abstractor Classes at Community Colleges - James Guill
2/6/2004 8:09:48 PM (1332 views)
Re: Abstractor Classes at Community Colleges - Robert Franco
2/8/2004 12:27:28 PM (1683 views)
Re: Abstractor Classes at Community Colleges - James Guill
2/8/2004 3:52:40 PM (1614 views)
Re: Abstractor Classes at Community Colleges - Angelica DelliCarpini
2/11/2004 7:03:25 PM (1691 views)
Re: Abstractor Classes at Community Colleges - Michael Persyn
2/12/2004 6:32:00 PM (1727 views)

DAMNED IF YOU DO.... DAMNED IF YOU DONT - AGRIVATED
2/6/2004 11:26:23 AM (1396 views)
Re: DAMNED IF YOU DO.... DAMNED IF YOU DONT - Jay Duncan
2/9/2004 12:10:22 AM (1737 views)

Hot Lists? - Joe Kalmon
2/6/2004 2:31:11 AM (1294 views)
Re: Hot Lists? - Jacqueline Costa
2/7/2004 5:22:10 PM (1612 views)
Re: Hot Lists? - Jay Duncan
2/9/2004 12:16:11 AM (1658 views)

Consumer Direct - Richard Martin
2/4/2004 5:55:32 AM (1290 views)
Re: Consumer Direct - Jay Duncan
2/4/2004 9:33:39 AM (1750 views)
Re: Consumer Direct - Richard Martin
2/20/2004 9:31:10 AM (1829 views)

BRIDGESPAN BANKRUPTCY - Jay Duncan
2/2/2004 4:13:19 PM (1517 views)
Re: BRIDGESPAN BANKRUPTCY - Shannon Blatt
2/17/2004 1:14:49 AM (1853 views)

Prices for signing services - Shawna Skinner
2/2/2004 1:00:31 PM (1332 views)
Re: Prices for signing services - Loretta Reed
2/2/2004 5:39:08 PM (1763 views)
Re: Prices for signing services - Debbie Morton
2/9/2004 2:41:41 PM (1734 views)

download problem - Alan Hirsch
1/30/2004 10:30:44 AM (1085 views)

Source of E-Mail Virus - Jay Duncan
1/29/2004 5:13:09 PM (1860 views)
Re: Source of E-Mail Virus - Slade Smith
1/29/2004 6:57:31 PM (1824 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8947 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

USA-based Abstractors - Part 1
Denise. Williams.'s Blog
2025/01/31
0 comments

Title Search in Maryland
Security American's Blog
2025/01/23
0 comments

Unique Aspects of Title Search in Virginia
Security American's Blog
2024/07/08
2 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Slight Decline in Rates Helps New Home Sales to Edge Higher in February
“Lower mortgage rates helped to lift demand in February, despite other near-term risks such as tariff issues and a...
Pending Home Sales Advanced 2.0% in February
"Despite the modest monthly increase, contract signings remain well below normal historical levels," said NAR Chief Econ...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Purchase applications saw the strongest weekly pace in almost two months and were 7 percent higher than a year ag...
NAR Introduces New MLS Policy to Expand Choice for Consumers
The policy – developed following many months of consultation with MLS and association leadership, brokerages, agen...
MISMO Seeks Comment on SMART Doc® V3 Security Instrument Specification
“The SMART Doc® V3 Security Instrument Specification is part of MISMO’s broader program to help increas...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.