I'm not sure exactly what's going on (all this he said she said stuff) but in David's defense he has a right and a duty to raise valid questions. It seems a lot of people are accusing David of being negative by being negative towards him. I agree there is no need for name calling or character assassination by anyone but if this sight is not about the free exchange of ideas and the betterment of all here, then what is it about?

to post a reply: login - or - register