and I agree with that sentiment - but the language of the original post seemed as if those of us that use online sources are not "real" examiners. People have to understand that if things are going to be done on a National level, then you have to accept that records are kept differently all over the country, and to say that one way of abstracting is better or worse than another is extremely subjective and I can hardly see how it could be legitimized that it should even be considered as a real policy.
to post a reply:
login - or -
register