Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Non-payment for services rendered - Serena Stout/VA
6/24/2005 12:08:53 PM (2681 views)
Re: Non-payment for services rendered - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 1:39:21 PM (6539 views)
Re: Non-payment for services rendered - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/24/2005 2:55:09 PM (3162 views)

If they have not complained to you about your work, have not paid you and have not responded to your demands for payment, they are most likely experiencing financial difficulties. The first thing you need to do is find out if they are still in business. If they have gone belly up or are insolvent any court judgment you obtain against them will be difficult to collect. The court does not act as a collection agency. It determines whether a debt is justly owed. If the defendant has no assets, you can not get blood out of a stone. If you do obtain a worthwhile judgment against them you need to follow your state's procedue to enforce the judgment. Usually that means having an execution (court order) issued by the court for a small fee which empowers a sheriff/marshal or other law enforcement official to levy on a bank account, wages, accounts receivable or to seize and sell non-exempt personal property to pay your judgment.

If you determine that the defendant is solvent, and worth suing, you next need to determine whether you were dealing with a corporation, limited liability company, general partnership, limited partnership or individual. Each has slightly different requirements for service of process depending on the state in which you or they reside. If you are within the jurisdiction of small claims court, the requirements of service of process are relatively simple.It is set up for people to proceed on their own without attorneys in the most simple way possible. Usually in small claims cases it is only a matter of paying a small filing fee, filing the complaint, and showing up to testify on the day of trial.  

If on the other hand the amount of your claim puts you up into the next tier of court (Superior Court in Connecticut), you will almost certainly need a lawyer because you will be held accountable to the same rules of evidence and civil procedure as a lawyer. If your own company is a corporation, limited liability company or other entity recognized by your state as having a legal identity separate from you personally, you will almost certainly need a lawyer because in most states a non-lawyer cannot represent these entities without engaging in an unauthorized practice of law. In Connecticut an exception is made for small claims court. 

In any event you will need to know the exact name of your client in order to write it on the court pleadings. This is important because if you win your case, and want the court to issue an execution, you will want the execution to match the client's name on the bank account, wages or accounts receivable that you are garnishing. This is also true as to the name on the defendant's personal property to be sold or the deed for real estate that is to be taken or sold at public auction after foreclosure to pay your judgment. Very often you can get this information by checking the webpage for the Secretary of State in which the defendant is located. There are also other sources for this information.

Now that you have determined that the defendant is solvent and worth suing ,and have determined the exact name of the defendant, you have to decide where to sue the defendant. If the defendant is located in the same state as your business, you can sue him in your state without too much of a problem. If the defendant is located in a different state, has not appointed the Secretary of State for your State or some other entity in your state to receive service of process or has not  engaged in other conduct which would render him subject to the jurisdiction of your state's court,  you will probably need to sue the defendant in his native state. There was a very long discussion on this issue last month on this board. If you do a search it may answer a number of your questions.

If the defendant is located in a foreign state, choosing a court in which to sue him may be a dilema. If you sue the defendant in your state, he is almost certain to test the jurisdiction of the court with a motion to dismiss. That is the first question that any good defense attorney will ask when he represents a client located outside the forum state. However, the defendant may not be represented by counsel, and may not know enough to file this motion or he may otherwise submit to the jurisdiction of your state's court. You may or may not win. If you lose on this issue you will need to refile the case in the court of the Defendant's native state. You will then need to pay the court's filing fee and any associated expenses for service of process a second time.  In my opinion a plaintiff is always better off suing a foreign defendant in his native state because it eliminates the defendant's ability to challenge the court's jurisdiction on the basis of his location.

If you win the suit the courts of most states will allow you to recover your filing fees and sheriff's/marshal's fee for service of process in addition to your damages.

You will also almost certainly be able to collect legal interest on the amount of the judgment if the defendant fails to pay your judgment immediately. In some states the interest will accrue from the date of judgment. In other states it will accrue from an earlier date. You can actually make money on the deal, and recover some of the costs of litigation through the legal interest. I won a case several years ago in which the defendant delayed in paying the judgment. By that time another $1,300.00 in legal interest had accrued. I found a really vicious female marshal to serve the property execution. She threw on  another 10% of the judgment on top of it for her fee. We received payment in full within a matter of days after she served the execution.

However, waiting to collect your judgment can be a gamble if the defendant is experiencing money problems. In this case you would want to execute on the judgment immediately. Whether you wait or proceed immediately to execute the judgment, you will want to secure the judgment by immediately filing/recording a judgment lien with the appropriate authority. In Connecticut that would be the Secretary of State for personal property and the Town Clerk in which the defendant's real estate is located. Filing/recording the judgment lien will protect you as a secured creditor in the event that the defendant bankrupts. It will also make it difficult for him to sell real estate or personal property with the lien attached to it or the buyer may become subject to the payment of your judgment. It will also impact on his credit rating if he is applying for a loan or other extension of credit.

Whether you can also recover attorney's fees depends on the law of the state in which the court is located. In Connecticut for instance you would need to have a written contract or statute that provided for recovery of attorney's fees, but the laws of the state in which you sue the defendant may differ. There are also alternate theories of recovery other than contract breach which may provide for the recovery of attorney's fees.

If you have to sue the defendant in another state and need an attorney it is a simple matter of making a telephone call to a law firm in the defendant's location. Law firms are very used to getting calls like this from out of state client's, and legal representation can be easily arranged. You will need to travel to the other state to testify at trial, and there will be travel expenses involved. You will need to consider whether this expense is justified by the amount you are trying to collect when making a decision as to whether or not to sue the defendant. However, in debt collection cases the defendant very often folds up, defaults and loses immediately by not appearing in the case or not pleading a response to your complaint. In this situation it becomes very easy to obtain your judgment at minimal expense.

So, to summarize:

1.     Determine if the defendant is still in business or insolvent.

2.     Make certain that you have the exact name of the defendant
        drafted on your court pleadings and executions. Do not use part 
        of the corporate name or limited liability company. Very often
        people forget to include the "Inc." or the "LLC" after the 
        defendant's name. Do not sue the defendant under a trade 
        name or fictitious name alone.

3.     Decide in which state to sue the defendant, and then observe the
        procedures of that court.

4.    If you win, have the court issue the appropriate order (An execution 
       in Connecticut) to enforce the judgment, and refer it to the appropriate 
       authority for collection.

This probably seems like a lot of information to digest, but that's the legal biz.

to post a reply: login - or - register


Serena, is that you - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 3:57:51 PM (2959 views)

The worst invention ever! - Robert Franco/OH
6/24/2005 9:32:21 AM (2564 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Jay Duncan/MO
6/24/2005 9:44:30 AM (2982 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - David Nixon/MA
6/24/2005 12:08:29 PM (2897 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 9:49:59 AM (2963 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 3:55:26 PM (2841 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/24/2005 4:48:38 PM (2847 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Kelly Chamblee/OH
6/27/2005 5:37:53 PM (2739 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Norean/GA
7/1/2005 6:19:22 PM (2791 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/2/2005 1:04:32 PM (3152 views)
Re: The worst invention ever! - Jeanne Mendes/CA
8/30/2005 5:41:59 AM (2655 views)

Sorry.... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/23/2005 5:33:58 PM (1874 views)

TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 10:36:17 AM (3534 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Kim Haase/MT
6/23/2005 11:50:43 AM (2926 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 12:15:19 PM (3011 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 12:58:16 PM (2950 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 1:50:32 PM (5724 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 1:55:43 PM (5467 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/23/2005 2:02:08 PM (2924 views)
THANK YOU TO LISA & DAVID - Kim Haase/MT
6/24/2005 3:27:52 AM (2916 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Jonathan Figliuolo/NY
6/27/2005 3:14:02 PM (2630 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/27/2005 6:46:02 PM (2701 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/28/2005 8:01:17 AM (2719 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/28/2005 11:29:35 AM (2581 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - David Bloys/TX
6/28/2005 3:04:43 PM (5435 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Robert Franco/OH
6/28/2005 3:22:23 PM (2619 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/28/2005 11:40:25 PM (2639 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/29/2005 11:23:17 AM (2644 views)
Re: TO ALL LENDING INSTITUTIONS ETC - Scott Perry/PA
6/29/2005 11:17:46 PM (2764 views)

Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/22/2005 6:10:51 PM (2438 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/23/2005 11:39:44 AM (2867 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/23/2005 1:55:44 PM (3040 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Ellen Malloy/MO
6/23/2005 9:21:20 PM (2907 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/24/2005 12:06:26 PM (2862 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/24/2005 12:56:46 PM (2650 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/24/2005 3:12:14 PM (2794 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/24/2005 4:05:54 PM (2698 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/25/2005 2:14:51 PM (2817 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/27/2005 2:48:58 PM (2711 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Robert Franco/OH
6/27/2005 3:35:47 PM (2647 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Jay Duncan/MO
6/27/2005 5:37:43 PM (2739 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Douglas Gallant/OH
6/26/2005 6:07:23 PM (2702 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Mark Russomanno/NJ
6/25/2005 11:59:33 PM (2653 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 7:49:42 AM (2577 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/26/2005 9:29:36 AM (2676 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 1:02:56 PM (2725 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - David Bloys/TX
6/26/2005 4:01:20 PM (2689 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/26/2005 4:38:20 PM (2674 views)
Re: Wouldn't Uniformity Be Cool? - Patrick Scott/IL
6/27/2005 3:03:57 PM (2588 views)


Real Title Services


2005 Independent Abstractor Report - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
6/21/2005 4:49:24 PM (2516 views)
Re: 2005 Independent Abstractor Report - Deborah Manion/VA
6/22/2005 3:04:55 PM (2601 views)
Re: 2005 Independent Abstractor Report - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
6/22/2005 3:32:41 PM (2758 views)

VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Michael Frank/TX
6/20/2005 7:21:18 PM (2529 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Michael Frank/TX
6/21/2005 1:55:00 PM (2780 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Robert Franco/OH
6/21/2005 2:17:29 PM (2965 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/21/2005 2:27:22 PM (2902 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/22/2005 5:55:03 PM (2758 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - Kim Haase/MT
6/23/2005 11:52:47 AM (2825 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - JOSEPH MARTINEZ/NM
7/6/2005 6:14:49 PM (2601 views)
Re: VENDOR MANAGERS SPEAK UP - J Nisonger/CA
7/8/2005 3:58:36 AM (2738 views)

Thanks for the E & O info - Kurt deVries/FL
6/20/2005 3:22:07 PM (2341 views)
Re: Thanks for the E & O info - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/20/2005 11:16:19 PM (2582 views)
Re: Thanks for the E & O info - Donna Grady/NC
7/7/2005 12:39:30 AM (2517 views)
Re: Thanks for the E & O info - Douglas Gallant/OH
7/7/2005 4:47:26 PM (2565 views)

Closing Company out of business? - Jen McClosky/OH
6/20/2005 1:57:34 PM (2288 views)
Re: Closing Company out of business? - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/20/2005 2:42:53 PM (2648 views)

QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/18/2005 8:33:42 PM (2531 views)
GUESS THAT ANSWERS MY QUESTION! - Scott Perry/PA
6/20/2005 4:24:12 PM (2909 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Suzannah White/TX
6/20/2005 6:01:55 PM (2875 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/20/2005 8:28:59 PM (2771 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/21/2005 11:09:04 AM (2796 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/21/2005 4:34:14 PM (2681 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Douglas Gallant/OH
6/21/2005 8:00:25 PM (2975 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Kevin Ahern/CT
6/21/2005 8:09:19 PM (2664 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Scott Perry/PA
6/21/2005 9:59:02 PM (2806 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Matthew DeLand/NY
6/28/2005 11:57:17 AM (2649 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR VM'S: HOW MANY OF YOU... - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/22/2005 3:46:55 PM (2776 views)

NALTEA conference/newsletter - Douglas Gallant/OH
6/17/2005 6:11:09 PM (1881 views)

D&S abstracting in Indiana - Michael Frank/TX
6/17/2005 3:36:33 PM (2079 views)

Titlesearch USA?????????? - Tammy Knight/MO
6/16/2005 9:44:29 PM (2434 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - christine hughes/MA
6/17/2005 6:53:54 AM (2864 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Barbara Bennett/IN
6/17/2005 12:22:36 PM (2743 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Julie Jasiunas/WI
6/17/2005 12:34:48 PM (2884 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Marilyn Parker/IL
6/17/2005 3:57:51 PM (2833 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Robert Franco/OH
6/17/2005 4:38:58 PM (2919 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Tammy Knight/MO
6/17/2005 5:50:18 PM (2851 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/17/2005 7:16:36 PM (2767 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Tammy Knight/MO
6/20/2005 2:58:05 PM (2712 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Marilyn Parker/IL
6/22/2005 8:29:27 PM (2641 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Veronica OWENS/MI
6/23/2005 6:27:15 PM (2776 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Tammy Knight/MO
6/28/2005 12:34:28 AM (2670 views)
Re: Titlesearch USA?????????? - Marilyn Parker/IL
6/29/2005 3:49:43 PM (2681 views)

HUD To Officially Annouce RESPA Reform - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/16/2005 11:33:20 AM (2262 views)
Re: HUD To Officially Annouce RESPA Reform - Patrick Scott/IL
6/16/2005 1:52:38 PM (2714 views)
Re: HUD To Officially Annouce RESPA Reform - Jason Sheppard/PA
6/17/2005 8:40:43 AM (2608 views)

E & O Insurance - Kurt deVries/FL
6/16/2005 10:43:02 AM (2184 views)
Re: E & O Insurance - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
6/16/2005 2:06:45 PM (2628 views)
Re: E & O Insurance - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/16/2005 2:26:35 PM (2649 views)
Re: E & O Insurance - Anne Gilbert/VT
6/19/2005 7:28:37 AM (2519 views)
Re: E & O Insurance - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/19/2005 11:04:20 AM (2569 views)
Re: E & O Insurance - Shannon Blatt/VA
6/19/2005 12:53:03 PM (2575 views)
Re: E & O Insurance - Lisa Ramsey/TX
6/19/2005 3:29:36 PM (4493 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

U.S. Housing Market Hits 30-Year Low in Home Sales: Causes and Consequences
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/09/08
0 comments

Understanding Mineral Rights and the Importance of Trained Mineral Researchers
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/09/05
0 comments

FHFA Title Acceptance Pilot: What to know
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/09/02
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

August Jobs Report Commentary from MBA's Mike Fratantoni
“Job growth slowed to just 22,000 in August and estimates for the prior two months were revised down by 21,000. Th...
Victory for Homebuyers: President Signs NAR-Supported Privacy Bill
“The National Association of Realtors® strongly supported this legislation from day one, fighting to end a pr...
First American Title Appoints Tara Smith Executive Vice President of Enterprise Growth and Multi-Brand Strategy
“Tara brings a powerful combination of industry expertise, strategic vision, and customer focus,” said Sally...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates declined last week, with the 30-year fixed rate decreasing to its lowest level since April to 6.64...
Single-Family Construction Down in Large Metros, Up in Rural Areas
“Multifamily market conditions remain stronger than expected, as single-family homeownership sits well out of reac...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.