Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | show all replies



[+] Shamrock Title, LLC - Smitty Strickland/SC (2 replies)
7/23/2005 6:45:29 PM (2830 views)

[+] Is Anyone Interested In? - Lisa Ramsey/TX (2 replies)
7/22/2005 5:15:21 PM (2720 views)

[+] TITLESEARCH USA - Marilyn Parker/IL (13 replies)
7/21/2005 12:23:11 PM (2849 views)

[+] ...ummm...dont be offended... - Ellen Malloy/MO (13 replies)
7/19/2005 3:34:59 PM (2792 views)

[-] a better way to email doc? - Donna Grady/NC (14 replies)
7/17/2005 12:18:26 AM (2639 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Robert Franco/OH
7/17/2005 12:59:29 AM (3532 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 12:45:53 PM (3401 views)

Dear Donna - I'm glad you brought this up as I was just thinking this past week about these document retrievals and what amount of time they ultimately entail from start to finish.  #1 too many of us are charging the same for a mortgage retrieval only as for a mort/assign retrieval requests.  To answer your question before I get it - no I don't charge the same but alot of abstractors do.  You should have never gone down to the price you did no matter how many requests you received for.  You think this is easy, and it may be, but it is as you say very time consuming to complete. 

Current Owner searches don't require much time after you complete the information report as the deed is the only other copy to send which is rarely over 2 pages.  With gas prices the way the are and the time we need to invest, or in Robert's case the price of the equipment isn't cheap, as I am sure the upkeep isn't either, document retrieval prices have to come up.  There have been price reductions not increases in the last 6 years that I am aware of - how stupid are we anyway. 

Here in Texas we use to charge a fee plus a per copy fee that was slightly higher that the copy fee we paid at the courthouse.  Some companies have now said they will not pay higher than the courthouse.  Well, the slightly higher fee was a very fair way of pricing as money was made on each page which covered our long distance fax, if that was the case, and the time it took to send the copy;.  Obviously, a document retrieval of 2 pages is much less time consuming than one of 40 pages.  Companies argued that we were getting our service fee - which was true and that should have been for the information we provided not obtaining copies too.  Here in Dallas we have to stand in lines - for an hour sometimes to get copies.  I have felt with the increase in gas prices, email service prices, scanner prices, etc. if they don't want us to charge a little more per page then we all need to increase the prices upward.  This is one service that I felt people were not considering all the time involved. 

For your information, alot of us have a tier pricing system on retrievals, 1-10 is this price, 11-20 is this price, 21-30 this price - some don't reduce after that - you have to at least make so much.  But each tier only 1-2 is given off each order with the first 10 being your full stated price.  From what I can see as your pricing as you stated above, your beginning price may be the lowest price alot of us will reduce to.

I personally liked the additional extra .50 per page price over the stated fee for information as I think it was fairer to their individual client as to what each order entailed.  But me personally, I think that if we are to do these for a flat fee in which no variance from a 2 page retrieval to a 40 page retrieval - all prices need to come up to 25.00 at least to cover our time, expensive equipment and travel expenses.  And remember this is severely affecting your cash flow too - you are holding costs for these clients.  I have abstractor friends that will not do these large order retrievals without cost deposits.  Informational retrievals could be priced lower - I love information only retrievals.  Anyone have thoughts on this?

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 1:22:43 PM (3217 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - David Bloys/TX
7/17/2005 4:27:14 PM (3349 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 9:57:29 PM (3287 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - David Bloys/TX
7/17/2005 2:56:13 PM (3315 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 3:31:10 PM (3353 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 4:01:26 PM (3281 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Matthew DeLand/NY
7/18/2005 9:40:15 AM (3300 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Donna Grady/NC
7/18/2005 11:47:23 PM (4842 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/19/2005 10:47:56 AM (3230 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/21/2005 10:57:53 AM (3396 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - STEVE MEINECKE/VA
7/29/2005 3:51:07 PM (3269 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - SHARON YAHRAES/ID
7/29/2005 7:14:45 PM (3131 views)




[+] NALTEA Certification - Jodi Earls/MI (3 replies)
7/15/2005 1:40:32 PM (2601 views)

[+] An instant messaging idea.. - SHARON YAHRAES/ID (8 replies)
7/15/2005 2:11:08 AM (2549 views)

[+] Marc Davis Strikes Again! - J.T. Shoemaker/NY (9 replies)
7/13/2005 4:16:31 PM (2967 views)

[+] National Title Department Promotion - J.T. Shoemaker/NY (2 replies)
7/12/2005 9:02:02 PM (2704 views)

Frustrated Abstractors Should Speak Out - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
7/12/2005 4:40:01 PM (2118 views)

[+] Anyone frustrated lately . . .??? - Michaela Urban/OH (13 replies)
7/12/2005 1:27:07 PM (2589 views)

[+] Has Anyone had experience with these two companies? - Matt Papsch/MD (5 replies)
7/12/2005 8:30:18 AM (3136 views)

[+] E & O - Wendi See/SC (4 replies)
7/11/2005 8:29:33 PM (2656 views)

[+] ...and in the "Dumb Question Department"... - Scott Perry/PA (10 replies)
7/11/2005 6:11:00 PM (2642 views)

Accusigning - Kevin Ahern/CT
7/11/2005 5:58:21 PM (2579 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8973 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Residential Appraisers: Reclaim Your Time
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/07/09
0 comments

ATTENTION CIOs, CTOs, VENDOR MANAGERS, AND SUPPLIER MANAGERS
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/06/15
0 comments

What Is Title Insurance & Benefits
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/03/14
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

NAR Statement On the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act and More Homes on the Market Act
“The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act will help increase housing supply, improve affordability, expand opportuniti...
NAR Statement On Sweeping Tax Reform Bill One Year Later
"One year after becoming law, the tax provisions included in this legislation continue to benefit homeowners, consumers,...
Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates eased slightly last week as oil prices declined. As a result, mortgage applications increased mode...
MBA Statement on FHFA and GSEs' Release of Historical Credit Score Data
“MBA welcomes the release of updated historical credit score data to support the implementation of VantageScore 4....
White House Derails Signing of Bipartisan Housing Bill Backed by Real Estate and Title Industries
A bipartisan housing bill backed by builders, REALTORS® and the title insurance industry passed both chambers of C...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.