Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | show all replies



[+] TITLESEARCH USA - Marilyn Parker/IL (13 replies)
7/21/2005 12:23:11 PM (2834 views)

[+] ...ummm...dont be offended... - Ellen Malloy/MO (13 replies)
7/19/2005 3:34:59 PM (2774 views)

[-] a better way to email doc? - Donna Grady/NC (14 replies)
7/17/2005 12:18:26 AM (2625 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Robert Franco/OH
7/17/2005 12:59:29 AM (3483 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 12:45:53 PM (3358 views)

Dear Donna - I'm glad you brought this up as I was just thinking this past week about these document retrievals and what amount of time they ultimately entail from start to finish.  #1 too many of us are charging the same for a mortgage retrieval only as for a mort/assign retrieval requests.  To answer your question before I get it - no I don't charge the same but alot of abstractors do.  You should have never gone down to the price you did no matter how many requests you received for.  You think this is easy, and it may be, but it is as you say very time consuming to complete. 

Current Owner searches don't require much time after you complete the information report as the deed is the only other copy to send which is rarely over 2 pages.  With gas prices the way the are and the time we need to invest, or in Robert's case the price of the equipment isn't cheap, as I am sure the upkeep isn't either, document retrieval prices have to come up.  There have been price reductions not increases in the last 6 years that I am aware of - how stupid are we anyway. 

Here in Texas we use to charge a fee plus a per copy fee that was slightly higher that the copy fee we paid at the courthouse.  Some companies have now said they will not pay higher than the courthouse.  Well, the slightly higher fee was a very fair way of pricing as money was made on each page which covered our long distance fax, if that was the case, and the time it took to send the copy;.  Obviously, a document retrieval of 2 pages is much less time consuming than one of 40 pages.  Companies argued that we were getting our service fee - which was true and that should have been for the information we provided not obtaining copies too.  Here in Dallas we have to stand in lines - for an hour sometimes to get copies.  I have felt with the increase in gas prices, email service prices, scanner prices, etc. if they don't want us to charge a little more per page then we all need to increase the prices upward.  This is one service that I felt people were not considering all the time involved. 

For your information, alot of us have a tier pricing system on retrievals, 1-10 is this price, 11-20 is this price, 21-30 this price - some don't reduce after that - you have to at least make so much.  But each tier only 1-2 is given off each order with the first 10 being your full stated price.  From what I can see as your pricing as you stated above, your beginning price may be the lowest price alot of us will reduce to.

I personally liked the additional extra .50 per page price over the stated fee for information as I think it was fairer to their individual client as to what each order entailed.  But me personally, I think that if we are to do these for a flat fee in which no variance from a 2 page retrieval to a 40 page retrieval - all prices need to come up to 25.00 at least to cover our time, expensive equipment and travel expenses.  And remember this is severely affecting your cash flow too - you are holding costs for these clients.  I have abstractor friends that will not do these large order retrievals without cost deposits.  Informational retrievals could be priced lower - I love information only retrievals.  Anyone have thoughts on this?

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 1:22:43 PM (3181 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - David Bloys/TX
7/17/2005 4:27:14 PM (3316 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 9:57:29 PM (3250 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - David Bloys/TX
7/17/2005 2:56:13 PM (3279 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 3:31:10 PM (3310 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/17/2005 4:01:26 PM (3238 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Matthew DeLand/NY
7/18/2005 9:40:15 AM (3253 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Donna Grady/NC
7/18/2005 11:47:23 PM (4803 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/19/2005 10:47:56 AM (3201 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - Lisa Ramsey/TX
7/21/2005 10:57:53 AM (3358 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - STEVE MEINECKE/VA
7/29/2005 3:51:07 PM (3234 views)
Re: a better way to email doc? - SHARON YAHRAES/ID
7/29/2005 7:14:45 PM (3099 views)

[+] NALTEA Certification - Jodi Earls/MI (3 replies)
7/15/2005 1:40:32 PM (2579 views)

[+] An instant messaging idea.. - SHARON YAHRAES/ID (8 replies)
7/15/2005 2:11:08 AM (2537 views)




[+] Marc Davis Strikes Again! - J.T. Shoemaker/NY (9 replies)
7/13/2005 4:16:31 PM (2954 views)

[+] National Title Department Promotion - J.T. Shoemaker/NY (2 replies)
7/12/2005 9:02:02 PM (2688 views)

Frustrated Abstractors Should Speak Out - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
7/12/2005 4:40:01 PM (2106 views)

[+] Anyone frustrated lately . . .??? - Michaela Urban/OH (13 replies)
7/12/2005 1:27:07 PM (2578 views)

[+] Has Anyone had experience with these two companies? - Matt Papsch/MD (5 replies)
7/12/2005 8:30:18 AM (3124 views)

[+] E & O - Wendi See/SC (4 replies)
7/11/2005 8:29:33 PM (2647 views)

[+] ...and in the "Dumb Question Department"... - Scott Perry/PA (10 replies)
7/11/2005 6:11:00 PM (2617 views)

Accusigning - Kevin Ahern/CT
7/11/2005 5:58:21 PM (2561 views)

[+] QuickClose - Robert Franco/OH (5 replies)
7/11/2005 1:35:12 PM (3656 views)

[+] A funny thing happened.... - SHARON YAHRAES/ID (2 replies)
7/10/2005 1:34:04 PM (2575 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8973 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

ATTENTION CIOs, CTOs, VENDOR MANAGERS, AND SUPPLIER MANAGERS
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/06/15
0 comments

What Is Title Insurance & Benefits
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/03/14
0 comments

The Source of Title - Part I: Freedom Written, Freedom Insured
Ben DuBay's Blog
2026/02/15
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Orange County Man Arrested on Federal Criminal Complaint Alleging He Defrauded Bank Out of Nearly $100 Million
An Orange County man was arrested today on a federal criminal complaint charging him with defrauding a bank out of nearl...
MISMO Releases FRAME: Framework for AI Governance in Mortgage Lending
“FRAME is fundamentally a risk management tool,” said Rick Hill, a key contributor to the framework and MBA&...
ALTA, Maryland Land Title Association and AARP Applaud Attorney General Anthony G. Brown for Action Protecting Homeowners from Unfair MV Realty Contracts
“These agreements can create serious uncertainty in the land records and unnecessary obstacles for homeowners and ...
Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates were volatile last week as news from the Middle East continues to drive markets,” said Mike ...
Over 1,100 Housing Advocates Call on Congress to Address Affordability
“Members of the housing community from across the country are in Washington for the National Association of Home B...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.