Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
10/31/2005 4:02:57 PM (3603 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Annette Dorty/PA
10/31/2005 6:36:32 PM (5315 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:03:33 AM (5354 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Laurie E/MD
11/1/2005 4:25:18 PM (5209 views)
Re: First Merit Settlement Services, Inc...... - Matt Papsch/MD
11/1/2005 10:52:12 PM (5145 views)

You mean I have to pay for it?? - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:25:11 PM (3218 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:39:14 PM (5404 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
10/31/2005 4:56:47 PM (5217 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Rachel Malone/PA
11/1/2005 7:18:01 AM (5081 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/1/2005 8:25:04 AM (5264 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kurt deVries/FL
11/1/2005 11:00:56 AM (5095 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/1/2005 12:59:42 PM (5133 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Nixon/MA
11/1/2005 2:27:05 PM (5192 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:37:02 AM (5083 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Kelli Gorman/TX
11/6/2005 1:39:05 AM (5120 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - george Hubka/MI
11/3/2005 5:24:23 AM (5023 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 1:40:35 PM (5126 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Phyllis Agan/GA
11/5/2005 1:00:14 PM (5042 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 3:11:22 PM (5032 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/5/2005 6:24:53 PM (5072 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - Scott Perry/PA
11/5/2005 10:12:02 PM (5121 views)
Re: You mean I have to pay for it?? - David Bloys/TX
11/6/2005 8:39:14 AM (5085 views)

Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 1:05:13 AM (3597 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 6:03:27 AM (5377 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 9:55:34 AM (5329 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/30/2005 11:01:49 AM (5334 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:10:18 AM (5271 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:20:44 AM (5313 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:57:34 AM (5386 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:47:41 AM (5090 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 11:40:40 AM (7095 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 12:26:09 PM (5391 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 12:56:30 PM (5468 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Donna Grady/NC
10/30/2005 10:07:33 PM (5205 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/30/2005 10:42:07 PM (5289 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 1:25:57 PM (5274 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Robert Franco/OH
10/31/2005 1:59:55 PM (5353 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Matthew DeLand/NY
10/31/2005 2:44:27 PM (5457 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Jan Forster/NC
10/31/2005 3:01:15 PM (5168 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - David Bloys/TX
10/31/2005 11:07:46 PM (5063 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/2/2005 7:52:40 AM (5095 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 1:48:08 PM (5044 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Kevin Ahern/CT
11/3/2005 3:49:00 PM (5009 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Michaela Urban/OH
11/3/2005 10:06:55 PM (5132 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 11:57:20 PM (4976 views)
Re: Red Vision article on SOT - Barbara Bennett/IN
11/4/2005 3:07:08 PM (5115 views)

TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 12:25:52 PM (3497 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/29/2005 1:58:01 PM (5468 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 3:46:53 PM (5163 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - monica froese/ME
10/29/2005 9:07:18 PM (5369 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/29/2005 10:02:46 PM (5189 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 2:46:39 AM (7510 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
10/30/2005 7:36:04 PM (5303 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - george Hubka/MI
10/31/2005 7:42:19 AM (5348 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:17:12 AM (5641 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:39:59 PM (5183 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:32:44 PM (5300 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:20:01 PM (5255 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:44:44 PM (5243 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
10/31/2005 9:25:59 PM (5113 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - J.T. Shoemaker/NY
11/1/2005 6:02:23 PM (5101 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/1/2005 7:47:31 PM (5074 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:05:20 PM (5133 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:10:38 PM (5101 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Scott Perry/PA
11/2/2005 7:47:20 AM (5225 views)
Re: TO JASON SHEPPARD - Jason Sheppard/PA
11/2/2005 3:06:05 PM (5196 views)

e-mail solicitation - christine/MA
10/28/2005 2:40:31 PM (3262 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 2:58:15 PM (5637 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jacqueline Quaresimo/PA
10/29/2005 3:20:56 PM (5092 views)
Re: e-mail solicitation - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:13:40 AM (5110 views)




QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Scott Perry/PA
10/27/2005 5:28:13 PM (3269 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/27/2005 7:00:49 PM (5594 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 6:33:17 AM (5780 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/28/2005 8:32:35 AM (5774 views)
Re: QUESTION FOR F. LEE... - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/28/2005 9:34:25 AM (5690 views)

C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 5:02:32 PM (3290 views)
Re: C2C - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/27/2005 5:24:29 PM (5937 views)
Re: C2C - Smitty Strickland/SC
10/27/2005 6:57:18 PM (5866 views)
Re: C2C - Anne Gilbert/VT
10/30/2005 10:35:27 AM (5814 views)
Re: C2C - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/30/2005 11:02:38 AM (5482 views)
Re: C2C - Jan Forster/NC
10/30/2005 11:16:02 AM (5444 views)
Re: C2C - Barbara Bennett/IN
10/30/2005 7:04:52 PM (5649 views)

The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 3:04:25 PM (3885 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 5:01:27 PM (5582 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:19:11 PM (5916 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 11:36:45 PM (5796 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - LAWANDA MCMILLIAN/AR
10/28/2005 9:04:13 AM (5921 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
10/28/2005 11:55:35 AM (5974 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/30/2005 3:36:45 AM (5515 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Scott Perry/PA
10/30/2005 8:28:20 AM (5346 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
10/30/2005 4:15:44 PM (7681 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jason Sheppard/PA
10/31/2005 11:18:07 AM (5481 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/31/2005 6:53:37 PM (5494 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/1/2005 10:00:35 AM (5476 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/1/2005 11:33:33 PM (5464 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - J Nisonger/CA
11/2/2005 4:42:30 AM (5398 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/2/2005 9:41:53 AM (7259 views)

Tammy,

There was a long hard discussion when NALTEA was being set up on who was going to be allowed to join, mainly based on years of experience.  In the end it was decided and accepted at the first conference that an abstractor, reguardless of experience could join, provided they fulfill the other membership requirements.  That is also why there are four different types of membership.  Please read the Code of Regulations http://www.naltea.org/code_of_regulations.pdf and you will see that to be a full member 70% of your income must come from abstract/title searching, etc...

NALTEA was not set up to oversee or run anyones business and not every member will agree on what NALTEA supports or does.  It would be pie-in-the-sky thinking if thought ever crossed anyone's mind.  Please read the mission statement of NALTEA in that same link.

NALTEA is an association that shows the industry that we, as abstractors, a) exist
 
b) care about what direction the industry is taking.

c) care about the training, or lack of training, that exist.

d) cares about how abstract work affects the consumer.

There is a Code of Ethics that you can view at http://www.naltea.org/ethics.pdf.  Those are the ethics that NALTEA goes by.  If someone believes those ethics have been violated then report it.  It is not an ethics violation just because one does not agree with a business approach.  NALTEA encourges people to step it up to the next notch.  NALTEA is not here to punish people.

Next there is another step in NALTEA to set one's self apart from other abstractors and that is the NALTEA Certification Program.  A lot of people have worked very hard on this and we are nearing the final review for this process.

Back to your questions:
The one thing that keeps our small biz from joining, is the fact that there doesn't seem to be any screening process for who you accept It's not so much what can NALTEA do for our company, but is my company going to rise a notch respectfully by being a member; because other companies know that not just anyone can get in.

Yes there is a screening process as outlined on the application and the Codie of Regulations.  Your statement reflects, yes you want something out it.  How can any company look down on you for joining an association that wants to improve abstractors and their part of the industry as a whole.

Are you going to not accept renewals from members that do exactly what NALTEA discourages and so on. If I join something, I want it to be deserved.

As long a member follows the Code of Regulations and Code of Ethics.  Again this goes back to abstractors are not going to agree on everything.

Has NALTEA ever turned anyone away or not let them renew their membership??  

As of this date NALTEA has not had to turn down any application that has been sent in.  Most abstractors that look to join NALTEA have good intentions.

If you are looking for an excuse not to join, there are a million of them.  There were a million of excuses not to put NALTEA together in the first place. 

But, there was a need to put NALTEA together and there is a need for abstractors to join NALTEA is they want to see any kind of positive change in the industry for abstractors and the consumer.

I hope I answered your questions.

Jay Duncan

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 3:15:16 AM (5501 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 10:08:57 AM (7294 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 10:51:28 AM (5536 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 11:05:37 AM (5416 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 12:09:46 PM (5377 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 12:58:57 PM (5348 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Patrick Scott/IL
11/3/2005 1:51:58 PM (5460 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Jay Duncan/MO
11/3/2005 2:16:46 PM (5318 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:39 PM (5410 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:31:40 PM (5369 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Langdon Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:34:10 PM (5431 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 5:09:11 PM (5379 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 5:42:30 PM (5288 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Robert Franco/OH
11/3/2005 6:01:28 PM (5215 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Tammy Knight/MO
11/3/2005 6:29:59 PM (5324 views)
Re: The Future of the Industry - Douglas Gallant/OH
11/3/2005 6:52:44 PM (5409 views)

Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 9:58:43 AM (3212 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 10:16:46 AM (7990 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:10:20 PM (8099 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 12:10:48 PM (7925 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Jay Duncan/MO
10/27/2005 12:17:05 PM (5858 views)
Re: Electronic storage - David Bloys/TX
10/27/2005 12:24:20 PM (5793 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Robert Franco/OH
10/27/2005 1:05:46 PM (8221 views)
Re: Electronic storage - Deborah Manion/VA
10/27/2005 3:58:05 PM (5595 views)

Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/25/2005 8:49:48 PM (3366 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Jay Duncan/MO
10/25/2005 9:10:51 PM (7903 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Loretta Reed/MD
10/26/2005 8:18:36 AM (6097 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Angela Glass/MD
10/26/2005 9:05:53 AM (5902 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/26/2005 11:24:06 AM (6022 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 3:40:05 PM (5941 views)
Re: Starting your own business - george Hubka/MI
10/27/2005 8:31:07 PM (5871 views)
Re: Starting your own business - Kurt deVries/FL
10/28/2005 11:26:19 AM (5847 views)

Passing... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/24/2005 3:24:08 PM (3383 views)
Re: Passing... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 5:07:51 PM (5844 views)
Re: Passing... - Kurt deVries/FL
10/25/2005 11:04:13 AM (5872 views)

Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Jarrod Clabaugh/OH
10/24/2005 10:19:12 AM (4404 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - Heather St. Amant/LA
11/14/2005 7:59:00 PM (5380 views)
Re: Abstractors Aid In New Orleans' Recovery - James "Lin" Toney/MS
11/14/2005 9:16:55 PM (5501 views)

Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/24/2005 12:06:20 AM (3343 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/24/2005 9:37:58 AM (6232 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - J Nisonger/CA
10/25/2005 10:43:14 PM (6127 views)
Re: Hey Kurt! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/26/2005 9:31:29 AM (6183 views)

Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:43:57 PM (4533 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Jay Duncan/MO
10/23/2005 10:48:42 PM (6006 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Langdon Knight/MO
10/24/2005 1:26:33 AM (5914 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Deborah Manion/VA
10/24/2005 9:20:18 AM (6326 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 11:23:40 AM (6281 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Scott Perry/PA
10/24/2005 9:33:41 PM (6302 views)
Re: Whine, whine, whine... - Patrick Scott/IL
10/24/2005 10:45:40 PM (6254 views)

Here we go again!! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/21/2005 3:38:08 PM (3482 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Scott Perry/PA
10/21/2005 4:15:36 PM (6148 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Kurt deVries/FL
10/21/2005 4:23:57 PM (6228 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Kevin Ahern/CT
10/21/2005 4:54:04 PM (6480 views)
Re: Here we go again!! - Lisa Ramsey/TX
10/23/2005 3:54:46 PM (6475 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

What Is Title Insurance & Benefits
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/03/14
0 comments

The Source of Title - Part I: Freedom Written, Freedom Insured
Ben DuBay's Blog
2026/02/15
0 comments

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

NAR Pending Home Sales Report Shows 1.8% Increase in February
“The slight gain in pending contracts appears to be driven by improved affordability conditions. However, those co...
New Home Sales Down in January on Weather Disruptions
“New home sales fell in January largely because of weather-related disruptions, even as mortgage rates eased modes...
FOMC Commentary from MBA's Mike Fratantoni
“Ongoing turmoil in the Middle East has significantly increased uncertainty regarding the current and future state...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates continued to move higher, driven by increasing Treasury yields as the conflict in the Middle East ...
New Title from NAHB's BuilderBooks Offers Advice on Using AI in Residential Construction
“Artificial intelligence is a growing part of our industry and is here to stay,” said NAHB Chairman Bill Owe...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.