A what if:

If the title is ordered as, the tax rolls show, he took title as, and all the title docs are executed as Douglas, James Ray

and it turns out there is a judgment only listed under Douglas, Ray (and its him) is the abstractor liable?

Or to put it another way is it reasonable to expect that an abstractor should always run the middle name as the first name even when there is no indication he uses both names as first names?

Just curious.