You know that I am not usually of the opinion that abstractors should resort to a lawsuit to collect from a client unless the amount owed is pretty substantial.  I don't think $400 is worth the expense and hassle - it would likely cost you more than you will ever recover.  However, in some cases the principal outweighs the practical costs of the matter.

It is completely unacceptable to stop payment on a check for services that have been rendered.  I think you should sue them for the amount due, plus any costs you incurred from your bank.

I would have to teach them a lesson at this point.  I concur with Kevin.

Best,
Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE