If it actually made its way to fruition at least one would have a place in line.  If it did not make its way to fruition it could compell one to pay vendors in a systematic way that is fair..  Many times in bankruptcy proceedings vendors that have received payments are compelled to repay them if they are deemed to have been received due to a favoristic approach to payment.

I believe that there is not a systemic problem going on at CRSI but a company of very good intentioned personal that has leadership issues.  The accounting department is good intentioned but never has had a plan, they have an absentee leader who does not communicate well or at all and hides behind emails and forums.

I hope they get purchased at the end of the day and that they get the leadership the good people of the company deserve.

When you have the president of the company agree with you on a plan to move ahead with a resolution and you agree to continue working with a company in the hopes of resolving AR issues...then the next thing you hear is that all your orders are cancelled and you will not be getting new orders because they feel your AR is getting to high...then I think you would also get to a point where you believe that a rotating vendor pool and an arbitrary forward dated line to pay vendors forward from is not in your best interest.

I have a novell approach...why don't they agree to pay vendors from the oldest invoice forward.  I am not looking to get back my money ahead of others I just want them to fairly and transparently begin a process that is legitimate.  If I can not get that by any other means...I guess your only alternative is to compel them to do it.