Scott,    (and Helen by her response),

I don't mean to chew or rag on you guys, but Scott's statement,  "so in the interest of

protecting the innocent", no mame is mentioned.   That appears what is wrong with

those who post on here sometimes, no spine.   I do not know from your posts WHO

this is, and if they contact me to replace one of you who turn them down, I have

no knowledge of who they are.    I then become one of the "bad boy abstractors".

Have spine and help us by giving a hint, or have Robert do a blog on them.

George