Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | show all replies



[+] Seeking Info on US Title Solutions - Smitty Strickland/SC (6 replies)
9/8/2008 6:10:40 PM (3965 views)

Seeking Feedback on a Company - Brad Bradbury/PA
9/8/2008 4:31:38 PM (2857 views)

[+] WHO NOT TO DO WORK FOR - Brian  Worthington/OH (2 replies)
9/8/2008 9:24:07 AM (3829 views)

NACA/ Bruce Marks - KH/NC
9/8/2008 7:48:34 AM (3284 views)

abstract realty, turnersville, nj DOES NOT PaY - KIMBERLY  FALCONE/PA
9/8/2008 5:56:17 AM (2855 views)




Jury Duty Scam - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 12:58:32 AM (4431 views)

[+] At last, solution to industry crisis!? - Jan Forster/NC (10 replies)
9/5/2008 11:47:55 PM (5161 views)

Broadway Abstract Corp. - CARRIE DOZIER/NY
9/5/2008 12:46:55 PM (2702 views)

[-] Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA (164 replies)
9/5/2008 10:51:13 AM (4739 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 1:31:35 PM (3060 views)
Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/5/2008 1:41:19 PM (3112 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 1:45:44 PM (3060 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kurt deVries/FL
9/5/2008 2:16:30 PM (3072 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:01:37 PM (3032 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 2:25:05 PM (5751 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 2:34:25 PM (2984 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 2:44:43 PM (2958 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 3:05:21 PM (3010 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:46:25 PM (3012 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:15:20 PM (2947 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:24:19 PM (2904 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:32:19 PM (2976 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:33:48 PM (2870 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/5/2008 8:04:22 PM (2981 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 9:21:21 PM (2988 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 12:06:31 AM (2968 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 1:35:16 AM (3036 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 11:24:59 AM (2886 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 1:24:11 PM (2936 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 2:29:34 PM (2832 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 2:55:09 PM (2898 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kurt deVries/FL
9/8/2008 5:05:24 PM (2780 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 7:03:37 PM (2679 views)
Re: Required Reading? - george Hubka/MI
9/28/2008 6:33:11 PM (2858 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 3:11:42 AM (2897 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Robert Franco/OH
9/6/2008 11:37:09 AM (2975 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 5:32:58 PM (2887 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 3:13:26 AM (2873 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 10:16:31 PM (2804 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 7:30:00 AM (2968 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 1:37:06 PM (2795 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 2:27:42 PM (2833 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 2:57:19 PM (2746 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 3:30:21 PM (2894 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/7/2008 4:56:41 AM (2671 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Janis Talbot/SC
9/7/2008 11:44:22 AM (2866 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/6/2008 4:33:21 PM (2941 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 5:01:21 PM (2806 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 5:10:09 PM (2663 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/7/2008 8:47:00 AM (2709 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/7/2008 6:19:44 PM (2860 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 12:16:09 AM (2695 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 8:00:21 AM (2641 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 10:57:16 AM (2661 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 11:51:50 AM (2647 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 12:57:23 PM (2653 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 1:41:50 PM (2490 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 2:05:26 PM (4569 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 2:30:53 PM (2426 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 3:46:53 PM (2470 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 4:18:14 PM (2477 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 4:59:45 PM (2438 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 5:34:15 PM (2354 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 6:19:58 PM (2408 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 5:00:19 PM (2253 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 5:39:49 PM (2485 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/8/2008 6:22:33 PM (2437 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/8/2008 7:06:45 PM (2355 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:04:46 AM (2329 views)
Re: Required Reading? - monica froese/ME
9/8/2008 6:33:01 PM (2344 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/8/2008 12:49:58 PM (2378 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 7:18:13 PM (2246 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 5:44:03 AM (2556 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 8:50:04 AM (2519 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 6:52:16 PM (2470 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/6/2008 10:05:58 PM (2680 views)
Re: Required Reading? - michael quinn/NY
9/6/2008 11:16:10 PM (2438 views)
Re: Required Reading? - charles jetter/OH
9/8/2008 7:15:38 AM (2389 views)
Re: Required Reading? - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 10:29:08 AM (2478 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 5:50:39 PM (2266 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 8:43:19 PM (2358 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:10:03 PM (2292 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 12:12:36 AM (2465 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/10/2008 3:32:14 PM (2333 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 9:58:46 PM (2543 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 2:45:55 PM (2586 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 3:06:41 PM (2441 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:53:15 PM (2563 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:48:37 PM (2390 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:06:07 PM (2395 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:08:28 PM (2444 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:10:47 PM (2590 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:12:30 PM (2339 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 5:54:22 PM (2213 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 8:53:12 PM (2505 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:19:54 PM (2284 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 11:35:46 PM (2473 views)
Re: Required Reading? - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 12:00:06 AM (2404 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 12:55:28 AM (2264 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:20:53 PM (2262 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:18:42 PM (2373 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 4:54:46 PM (2510 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:02:54 PM (2514 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:06:18 PM (2533 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:08:24 PM (2492 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:09:55 PM (2433 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:12:05 PM (2502 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:14:11 PM (2438 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:16:22 PM (2428 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 5:25:38 PM (2364 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/5/2008 5:35:40 PM (2405 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Anita Backlund/MN
9/5/2008 10:21:38 PM (4249 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Scott Perry/PA
9/5/2008 11:03:14 PM (2372 views)
Re: Required Reading? - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/6/2008 7:58:35 AM (2648 views)
Re: Required Reading? - charles jetter/OH
9/8/2008 7:37:51 AM (2376 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 11:23:40 AM (2481 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 4:17:30 PM (2483 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/8/2008 4:20:12 PM (2392 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 4:22:41 PM (2377 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 7:35:41 PM (2410 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/8/2008 8:13:01 PM (2304 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - john rutledge/VA
9/8/2008 11:47:04 PM (2356 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 6:56:02 AM (2175 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 6:24:30 PM (2307 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 8:32:11 PM (2485 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:27:22 PM (2218 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:49:48 PM (2225 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:45:21 PM (2379 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 12:52:40 AM (2271 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/10/2008 6:26:38 AM (2327 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 6:38:47 AM (2296 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 7:12:39 AM (2240 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 7:51:00 AM (2268 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 10:12:53 AM (2182 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 10:15:34 AM (2335 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 9:00:43 AM (2323 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 11:42:12 AM (2238 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 9:15:13 PM (2251 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 6:36:09 AM (2240 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/13/2008 12:07:24 PM (2158 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 2:00:16 PM (2241 views)

Scott,

I really do not know how to put it into words simple enough for you to understand. However the Court's ruling on this was unmistakably clear:

       " Article I's plain language, read as a whole, establishes that Congress may authorize members of the National Guard of the United States to be ordered to active federal duty for purposes of training outside the United States without either the consent of a state governor or the declaration of a national emergency." Pp. 496 U. S. 347-355.

       "The unchallenged validity of the dual enlistment system means that Guard members lose their state status when called to active federal duty, and, if that duty is a training mission, the training is performed by the Army. During such periods, the second Militia Clause is no longer applicable." Pp. 496 U. S. 347-349.

       " The District Judge rejected the Governor's challenge. He explained that the National Guard consists of "two overlapping, but legally distinct, organizations. Congress, under its constitutional authority to 'raise and support armies' has created the National Guard of the United States, a federal organization comprised of state national guard units and their members. " 666 F.Supp. 1319, 1320 (Minn.1987). [Footnote 4] The fact that these units also maintain an identity as Page 496 U. S. 339 state national guards, part of the militia described in Art. I, § 8, of the Constitution, does not limit Congress' plenary authority to train the Guard "as it sees fit when the Guard is called to active federal service." Id. at 1324. He therefore concluded that "the gubernatorial veto found in §§ 672(b) and 672(d) is not constitutionally required. Having created the gubernatorial veto as an accommodation to the states, rather than pursuant to a constitutional mandate, the Congress may withdraw the veto without violating the Constitution."

         In answer to Anita's statement questioning the receipt of dual notifications from both the State and the Federal activation the court also addressed this issue. " Congress has by distinct statutes provided for activating the National Guard of the United States and for calling forth the militia, including the National Guards of the various States. See 10 U.S.C. §§ 672-675 (authorizing executive officials to order reserve forces, including the National Guard of the United States and the Air National Guard of the United States, to active duty); 10 U.S.C. §§ 331-333 (authorizing executive officials to call forth the militia of the States); 10 U.S.C. §§ 35OO, 8500 (authorizing executive officials to call forth the National Guards of the various States). When the National Guard units of the States are called forth, the orders "shall be issued through the governors of the States." 10 U.S.C. § 3500."

                " The unchallenged validity of the dual enlistment system means that the members of the National Guard of Minnesota who are ordered into federal service with the National Guard of the United States lose their status as members of the State militia during their period of active duty. If that duty is a training mission, the training is performed by the Army in which the trainee is serving, not by the militia from which the member has been temporarily disassociated."

               "Congress has provided by statute that, in addition to its National Guard, a State may provide and maintain at its own expense a defense force that is exempt from being drafted into the Armed Forces of the United States. See 32 U.S.C. § 109(c). As long as that provision remains in effect, there is no basis for an argument that the federal statutory scheme deprives Minnesota of any constitutional entitlement to a separate militia of its own. [Footnote 25]           

                  You have cited a portion of the footnote in question illustrating an example of when a gubernatorial veto might be exercised. You have omitted the portion of the footnote containing the Governors concessions that it is of little use, and subject to federal accommodation.  The Governor contends that the residual veto power is of little use. He predicates this argument, however, on a claim that the federal training program has so minimal an impact upon the State Guard that the veto is never necessary…To suggest that a governor will ever be able to withhold consent under the Montgomery Amendment assumes (1) local emergencies can be adequately predicted in advance, and (2) a governor can persuade federal authorities that National Guard members designated for training are needed for state purposes when the overwhelming majority of the National Guard remains at home."     [Footnote 24

               The above citations are not my words, but rather the words of the court. Since the gubernatorial veto of which you speak is a statutory accommodation and not a constitutional right, the accommodation may be withdrawn by Congress at will. While the circumstances may give rise to a gubernatorial veto, it is still subject to federal approval,  not a matter of right and there is no guaranty of securing agreement of the federal government.

        

 

 

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/13/2008 2:17:54 PM (2326 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 6:37:46 AM (2413 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/13/2008 6:39:19 AM (2279 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 1:53:00 PM (2354 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/10/2008 1:59:32 PM (2310 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 2:17:04 PM (4039 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 7:54:46 AM (2329 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 8:32:22 AM (4176 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 9:32:21 AM (2397 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/12/2008 10:07:14 AM (2438 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/12/2008 10:34:24 AM (2478 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/15/2008 2:04:15 AM (2507 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Kevin Ahern/CT
9/15/2008 5:05:56 AM (2299 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/15/2008 2:41:32 PM (2435 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/15/2008 3:22:43 PM (2464 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Slade Smith/OH
9/9/2008 2:44:44 AM (2298 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 6:39:55 AM (2294 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 6:29:31 PM (2273 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/9/2008 9:16:03 PM (2191 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/9/2008 10:33:47 PM (2325 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/9/2008 11:54:12 PM (2311 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 1:00:43 AM (2161 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 1:00:52 AM (2262 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Anita Backlund/MN
9/10/2008 11:38:47 AM (2311 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - J Nisonger/CA
9/10/2008 1:25:41 PM (2320 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 4:07:47 PM (2304 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 4:50:38 PM (2347 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Douglas Gallant/OH
9/10/2008 6:02:05 PM (2495 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Scott Perry/PA
9/10/2008 7:37:23 PM (2316 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/12/2008 11:47:07 AM (2506 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - michael quinn/NY
9/13/2008 2:48:17 PM (2242 views)
Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work - Clanci Nelson/OH
9/16/2008 11:45:00 AM (2367 views)

[+] STOP STOP STOP - . APS/NY (14 replies)
9/4/2008 3:35:36 PM (3515 views)

[+] CMS-Consumer Marketing Services - Patrick /NY (2 replies)
9/4/2008 1:26:57 PM (5273 views)

Ohio Sick-day Ballot Initiative Pulled! - Robert Franco/OH
9/4/2008 1:01:46 PM (2533 views)

Dynamic Signings - Ilene Seidel/MD
9/3/2008 10:15:28 PM (2653 views)

[+] Owners Title Policy Tells Consumer Nothing - Jeanine Johnson/FL (11 replies)
9/3/2008 5:05:25 PM (3340 views)

GMAC Streamlining of Mortgage Operation - Rochelle Finci/MD
9/3/2008 1:34:54 PM (2826 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8956 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Let’s Talk about the US Dollar
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/07/18
0 comments

Understanding Survivorship Marital Property vs. Joint Tenancy in Wisconsin
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/07/16
0 comments

How “Buy Now, Pay Later” Loans Are Starting to Affect Your Credit Score
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/07/14
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Joint Trades Press Statement on FHFA Announcement on Credit Scores
"FHFA Director Pulte’s July 8 directive to the GSEs to adopt a modernized credit score, VantageScore 4.0, was a pr...
Westcor Land Title Insurance Company® Partners on Fannie Mae Title Acceptance Pilot
“We’re proud to support the GSEs’ modernization goals while continuing to uphold the core value of tit...
Remodeling Market Sentiment Dips in Second Quarter
“Most remodelers continue to express positive sentiment, but some, especially in the western part of the country, ...
Title Resources Group Appoints Michael Campbell as Underwriting Counsel for Michigan
"Michael's diverse title agency and underwriting background in high-volume and boutique shops gives him the broad experi...
Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates moved lower last week, with the 30-year fixed rate decreasing to 6.77 percent, its lowest level in...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.