Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | show all replies



[+] nXt Generation Title Services, LLC - Dan Zook/NY (11 replies)
2/5/2009 8:59:26 AM (3469 views)

[+] mortgage fraud - Sheila Sten/PA (4 replies)
2/4/2009 3:48:02 PM (3230 views)

[-] Off the beaten path - AbstractorWatchdog com/NY (34 replies)
2/3/2009 10:36:52 PM (3124 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
2/3/2009 11:31:49 PM (2992 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Patrick Scott/IL
2/4/2009 12:01:44 AM (2955 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Scott Perry/PA
2/4/2009 12:55:17 AM (3001 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Robert Franco/OH
2/4/2009 10:42:36 AM (2964 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/4/2009 10:52:16 AM (2964 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Scott Perry/PA
2/4/2009 11:18:23 AM (2835 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Clanci Nelson/OH
2/5/2009 4:48:33 PM (2888 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Scott Perry/PA
2/5/2009 7:43:44 PM (5395 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Robert Franco/OH
2/6/2009 10:09:45 AM (2679 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Scott Perry/PA
2/6/2009 11:53:54 AM (2727 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Robert Franco/OH
2/6/2009 12:44:49 PM (2666 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Scott Perry/PA
2/6/2009 1:51:09 PM (2649 views)
Still makes no sense.... - Robert Franco/OH
2/9/2009 1:09:11 PM (2902 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Scott Perry/PA
2/10/2009 3:26:30 AM (2697 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Robert Franco/OH
2/10/2009 9:59:16 AM (2681 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Debbie Thibodeaux/LA
2/11/2009 1:07:54 PM (2633 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Robert Franco/OH
2/11/2009 1:43:23 PM (2572 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/11/2009 4:48:23 PM (2594 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Robert Franco/OH
2/12/2009 12:46:38 AM (2544 views)
Re: Still makes no sense.... - Douglas Gallant/OH
2/11/2009 5:06:23 PM (2594 views)
As I Was Saying... - Scott Perry/PA
2/16/2009 12:14:21 AM (2587 views)
Re: As I Was Saying... - Robert Franco/OH
2/16/2009 11:56:29 AM (2694 views)

Hey Scott,

Here is my re-re-re-rebuttal... First, I hope your wife is okay and makes a speedy recovery.

It seems that you have a crystal ball of some sort.  Since you indicate that my prognostications about the future under the Fair Tax are "incorrect assumptions."  I don't think can accurately say that those are incorrect until the Fair Tax passes and we see the result, which of course will never happen.  It won't happen for that very reason - nobody knows what would happen, but the fear of the consequences are logical.

#1:  You correctly point out that much of the spending is discretional.  Our economy relies on discretionary spending and if you increase the taxes on discretionary spending people will spend less on those items.   Even with the "pre-bates," if a person can avoid paying higher taxes they will most likely choose to do so.  We are seeing now what happens when discretionary spending slows down - it would logically be worse under the Fair Tax.

#2:  You point to the sales taxes in Texas and Florida as proof that a national sales tax would not lead to a black market.  But, the maximum tax in Florida is only 7.5% and in Texas its is 8.25%.  That is a far cry from the 30% the Fair Tax would impose.  A modest sales tax can, and does, work in many states.  However, the 30% rate under the Fair Tax would create a huge profit incentive for black markets.  As I already pointed out, look what happened when the government started taxing cigarettes - a huge black market developed. 

You also pointed to the VAT in Denmark as an example.  Our of curiosity, I looked it up and Denmark is among the nations with the highest tax in the world!  They do have a VAT tax (which is not quite the same as the Fair Tax) AND they have a progressive personal income tax (with rates as high as 59%).  That is another point I made - if we tried to implement the Fair Tax, we would have both a national sales tax and an income tax.  Furthermore, the VAT rate in Denmark is only 10%... much less than the Fair Tax proposes.

#3:  You seem to believe that social factors, like ego and social status, will still drive people to buy luxury items despite the 30% tax added.  We will just have to disagree on that.  Sure, some will; the filthy rich will always want their toys and some of them may even want them new.  Personally, I would be very happy with a used Mercedes or Jaguar and avoid paying a 30% premium.  I think most people would gravitate to used items when there is a huge tax on the new ones.

I agree that there are various reasons why the U.S. automakers are in trouble.  My point is only that that adding a 30% tax to new cars would exacerbate the problem.  This is exactly why the Tax Code is used to encourage some activities and discourage others - because it works.  If you raise taxes on something, people will buy less of it - if you exempt taxes on certain purchases, people buy more.

#4:  Any tax code, whether a progressive income tax or a national sales tax, will influence behavior.  The Fair Tax would do it with an axe, as opposed to a scalpel.  The Fair Tax encourages savings and punishes spending.  That would not help our economy which is dependent on consumer spending.  I do think we need to encourage more people to save, but the Fair Tax goes too far in that regard.

#5:  You still don't seem to understand the difference between progressive taxation and regressive taxation.  You said:

 I call our current system regressive because it punishes achievement and rewards poverty. What’s so progressive about a system that demands that you pay tax at a higher rate than me because you worked your tail off and made more money than I did?

A system that "demands that you pay a tax at a higher rate... because... [you] made more money" is the definition of a progressive tax!  If you believe that lower income people should pay more, then you are in favor of a regressive tax.  You're position that "if we started taxing poverty, there would be less of an incentive to be poor" is ridiculous.  You can't make someone less poor by taking more of their money.  Again, that is just simple logic.  The harsh reality is that the poor can't afford to pay more taxes - you can't get blood from a stone.

#7:  You are right, the tax under the Fair Tax plan is 23%, but it actually works out to be a 30% tax... here is how:

The Fair Tax is a whole different game. Instead of taxing income, this tax would hit consumption. Its proponents want to substitute what's often described as a flat 23% national sales tax on nearly all goods and services. But that 23% figure is a mirage. You'd actually pay 30% at the cash register. 

Think of it as a tax on your buying power. Fair Tax proponents say income taxes now make up about 23% of the cost of goods sold. Take away that tax and the cost of a $100 good, they say, would drop to $77. The Fair Tax would collect that $23 discount as a straight sales tax, which works out to 30% added to the price of goods and services. State and city taxes could be added on top of that.

I agree that people would have more disposable income if they actually received their entire paychecks and they got a $6,000 pre-bate.  However, since most middle income families spend all of their income - they save virtually nothing now - they will pay an effective rate of 30%, less the $6,000 pre-bate.  Because they will be taxed at 30% when they spend their pre-bate, it is really only worth $4,200.  I think most families are better off with a graduated tax rate that starts at only 10%.

#8:  With a Roth IRA you pay the sales tax when you invest the money - and it is tax free when you draw it out.  Thus, if you invest $100,000 over the course of your working-life, you may pay as much as $35,000 in taxes on that money as you contribute to your Roth IRA.  If that money grows to $200,000, you pay no income tax on the other $100,000.  Under the Fair Tax, those with Roth IRAs would have paid their $35,000 in tax and they would pay an additional $60,000 in "Fair Tax" when they spend it in retirement.  Thus, the Fair Tax punishes those that saved wisely for their retirement... seems like poor public policy to me.

#9:  Now who is making assumptions??  You assume that housing prices will drop because you are eliminating the "embedded" taxes in the cost of a home.  However, you fail to realize that the housing market has been around a while and those costs are already in there.  Are you suggesting that sellers will drop the price of their homes just because the Fair Tax is implemented??  I don't think so.  If you were right, the housing market would take an instant hit as soon as the Fair Tax was passed - I'm sure there are millions of homeowners that would not appreciate that very much - I'm one of them.

You seem to want to have this both ways.  You insist that the Fair Tax would provide a stable base because people are going to spend the same regardless of the new national sales tax (out of ego, or social status)... then you say "...they can determine how much tax they pay based on the choices they make."  If people can choose, they are always going to choose to pay less in taxes.    Thus, your arguments are inconsistent.  That seems to be the major flaw in your analysis.

Best,
Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Commercial Activity Tax... - Robert Franco/OH
2/16/2009 3:04:27 PM (5137 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Clanci Nelson/OH
2/6/2009 4:45:51 PM (2799 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/6/2009 6:17:30 AM (2641 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Robert Franco/OH
2/6/2009 10:03:24 AM (2662 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/4/2009 10:47:54 AM (2826 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Robert Franco/OH
2/4/2009 11:06:18 AM (2724 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/4/2009 11:10:33 AM (2659 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Scott Perry/PA
2/4/2009 11:31:26 AM (2714 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/4/2009 11:59:28 AM (2769 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Barbara Bennett/IN
2/4/2009 3:28:50 PM (2601 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Kevin Ahern/CT
2/4/2009 11:21:39 AM (2680 views)
Re: Off the beaten path - Clanci Nelson/OH
2/5/2009 4:25:01 PM (2822 views)

[+] reporting non-paying title companies to the underwriters - Michael Lanin/KY (7 replies)
2/3/2009 1:20:18 PM (2968 views)

Title Assurance & Indemnity Corp. of NA Cleveland, OH - MIchael Lanin/KY
2/3/2009 1:01:36 PM (2273 views)




[+] The Law Firm of Crystal Lowery - Edward Huguenin/SC (4 replies)
2/1/2009 8:20:52 AM (3397 views)

[+] What is considered slow pay? - no name/MI (2 replies)
1/30/2009 12:50:38 PM (2989 views)

[+] Probate Question - Helene /GA (7 replies)
1/29/2009 11:50:27 PM (2877 views)

[+] Preview of Coming Attractions? - Scott Perry/PA (11 replies)
1/29/2009 10:53:59 PM (4553 views)

[+] The Bankruptcy Club - AbstractorWatchdog com/NY (8 replies)
1/29/2009 2:56:14 PM (3164 views)

[+] MONEY OWED - quinn cioffi/PA (2 replies)
1/28/2009 2:38:15 PM (3215 views)

New Real Estate Numbers Are Out - AbstractorWatchdog com/NY
1/28/2009 2:25:36 PM (3956 views)

[+] Snow Day! - Robert Franco/OH (13 replies)
1/28/2009 12:39:37 PM (2863 views)

[+] NALTEA - AbstractorWatchdog com/NY (2 replies)
1/28/2009 12:13:09 PM (2690 views)

Buckeye Land Abstract - Sybil East/GA
1/27/2009 12:54:18 PM (3051 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8956 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Creative Ways Millennials and Gen Z Are Approaching Homeownership
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/07/02
0 comments

How Another War in the Middle East Could Impact the Housing Market
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/06/30
0 comments

The Aging of the American Homebuyer: A 40-Year Shift and Its Economic Impact
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/06/20
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

NAR Secures Major Wins for Real Estate in Landmark Tax Reform Bill
“For months, REALTORS® across America have been at the forefront of tax reform, making sure Congress understo...
Title Resources Group Announces Executive Management Transition
Title Resources Group (TRG), the nation's fifth largest title insurance underwriter, announced today the appointment of ...
Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Mortgage rates were lower across all loan types last week, with the 30-year fixed rate declining to its lowest le...
Stewart Group Senior Vice President, Direct Operations and President of Stewart Title of California Wyomia Clifton Honored with HousingWire's 2025 Women of Influence Award
Clifton currently oversees operations across nine states in her role as Group Senior Vice President, Direct Operations a...
Rocket Companies Completes Acquisition of Redfin
The companies also today introduced Rocket Preferred Pricing. Clients who finance their home through Rocket Mortgage and...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.