Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Lower fees for no tax info w/search - george Hubka/MI
1/25/2010 7:28:08 AM (4004 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Robert Franco/OH
1/25/2010 9:23:22 AM (3994 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - george Hubka/MI
1/25/2010 10:00:27 AM (3887 views)
Re: Lower fees for incomplete search! - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
1/25/2010 11:11:31 AM (3897 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Robert Franco/OH
1/25/2010 11:35:50 AM (3729 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/25/2010 2:49:53 PM (3792 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Robert Franco/OH
1/25/2010 3:26:09 PM (3791 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Dan Zook/NY
1/26/2010 10:12:48 AM (3773 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/25/2010 10:59:01 AM (3678 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Clanci Nelson/OH
1/25/2010 4:14:33 PM (3776 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - George Booth/OH
1/25/2010 4:43:35 PM (3935 views)

Since a VM is requesting this reduction, I would politely refuse.

Reason being: They are typically the Fidelity Property Svs / Safeguard Properties VMs that will still continue to charge HUD and the bank full price for the title work being done anyways. They have virtually iron-clad contracts with these banks. The service they are offering is simply lien priority on foreclosures. Some one , somewhere decided through the data that most likely every house in foreclosure was most likely behind on taxes as well, so they saw this as an opportunity to trim more off their bottom line, without even knowing the ins and outs of searching.

Prashat is most likely making a killing off these 10 second searches and unfortunately people will need to make the decision whether to feed their family or stick to their principles. It's simple economics to them, lower your cost, or we will find someone cheaper. I myself found a new profession rather than whore my experience and service out to a VM.

 

We all saw this coming; for further proof, here are some members of SOT and myself after an interview in 2007.

Once a job that stood proudly at the core of the entire land title industry, abstracting has taken a financial backseat to the billions earned by the insurance product it supports. In the process, those billions have been poured into creating databases and technology that may someday make abstracting all but obsolete.

George Booth knows this firsthand. A third-generation abstractor, Booth has seen the highs and lows of the industry. Growing up in Florida, Booth carried his father’s briefcase into the courthouse. He learned to abstract with a legal pad of paper. “I grew up with the family curse,” he said.

“Title examining is a passion, it takes a particular mindset,” said Booth, who also is a licensed real estate agent and mortgage broker. “You have to be analytical. You have to delve into more than what is on the paper. It’s like little clues on each document of paper and you have to hunt them down.”

Current trends in the industry have jaded Booth’s passion. Once the owner of an abstracting company in Medina, Ohio, that covered seven counties, Booth now is mulling a new career path as orders have stopped coming in.

“To give blood sweat and tears and watch the industry and the incompetence literally unfold it in a decade, it hurts,” said Booth, whose brother, R.F. Booth Jr., continues to operate Community Land Title in Port St. Lucie, Fla.

Booth, who has worked in the industry since leaving the Navy in 1994, isn’t the only abstractor feeling the noose tighten. Issues such as non-paying or slow-paying clients, turn-around times, instant title searches and records going online, offshoring of records and lowering of prices have all played a role in dividing the abstracting community and shrinking its ranks.

According to a national survey conducted by Bankrate.com in 2006, national costs for title insurance for a $200,000 loan ranged from a high of $1,164 to a low of $418. The average was $663. Meanwhile, the cost associated with an abstract continued to be compressed.

Jay Duncan, president of Missouri-based Bi-State Title Search, said several people flooded the abstracting market during the refinance boom willing to complete searches at minimal prices.

“You had these so-called ‘tow truck Joes’ that would pull in front of a courthouse, drag their nose across their sleeve and say ‘I’m an abstractor,’“ Duncan said. “They would cut-throat everyone’s prices. There are people doing $15, $20, $25 current-ownership searches. Then the refi boom ended. Now, you have all these title problems and prices have been cut so low that others had to cut their prices to keep business.”

Because price depends on proximity to a courthouse, rural areas will pull out a higher price due to travel time. Many searches in Florida go for $25 because they are online. Searches west of Kansas and the Northwest can fetch $150 for current homeownership searches, as opposed to the East Coast where there are more abstractors and courthouses that drive down cost.

Duncan, who started his company in 2000, said some title companies use abstractors against each other. A company will contact an abstractor and say they have a person who will do the work for $40. “They will ask another abstractor to do it for $35,” he said. “Then they go back to the other and ask to have the work done for $30.”

Booth said he used to charge $125 for a full search, now you can get the same search for $35.

“Abstractors aren’t in a position to turn down work,” Booth said. “When it comes down to doing what’s good for the industry or paying the car payment, people will make their car payment. On one face they will say ‘damn the torpedoes this isn’t right,’ but on their other face, they will ask the VMCs if they have sent over their orders.”

Many accept lower terms just to survive and ensure future business.

“Sometimes, you’ve got to fire the client even though they are making the house payment,” Booth said. “Go find a new client. It’s hard to get an abstractor to value their work and put a price on it.”

As pressure mounts from lenders and title companies to maximize profit, some abstractors wonder if title policies will even be ordered since abstractors carry errors and omissions insurance.

“It makes me wonder if that’s going to be the next criminal activity where a title company charges $500 for the title policy and just pockets the money. If there is a title problem they will go after the abstractor,” Booth said.

Automation clock ticking

Armed with 11 full-time abstractors, four title examiners and a network of abstractors, Bi-State Title operates in nine other states including Illinois, Kansas, Indiana, Texas, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. That’s not the norm for most title examination shops. Most are one to three-person stores.

But it’s those grass-root shops some say will guarantee the future of abstracting. While technology has its benefits in saving time and helping with research, it can come with a loaded gun if not used properly.

Mary Mitchel, president of the National Association of Land Title Examiners and Abstractors, said public access systems are only as good as the user.

“If you don’t know and understand how the records were indexed or the quirky little ways to pull up certain names and documents, you are doomed before you begin,” she said. “We all know each county has its own rules for properly locating certain documents. You would have no way of knowing those types of issues unless you spend time in your county. That is why we are so very important to this industry, regardless of the direction it may take in the future.”

A need for quality control and quality assurance will require human analysis on an ongoing basis on all transactions. The level of involvement and touch time on residential transactions will be reduced with the majority of time spent on complicated residential and commercial transactions. Elsewhere in the commonwealth — such as the western and central portions — most courthouses remain field-oriented where the abstractor has to go and pull books. Few courthouses in the southeastern part of the state are not online either.

“We see a couple of changes on the horizon in Virginia abstracting that will affect how, and how many, abstractors are utilized,” said Jim Cooke, Virginia production manager for LandAmerica Financial Group. “First, and most visible, is the increase in online records. Fewer searchers will be required to remain in the field. This does not diminish, however, the need, just the location that they do their work. Second, automation. With data services like Datatrace, DataCheck, etc., coupled with online records, automated products will surely become a normal part of the process in the years ahead in Virginia, as they are in other parts of the country, particularly residential transactions. However, the expertise required on the commercial transaction will require the continued use of abstractors, be they in the office ‘online’ or in the field.”

The role an abstractor plays in a transaction can directly be tied to geographic location. Pat Neu, who is the Florida production manager for LandAmerica, said the quality and quantity of electronic data also impacts an abstractor’s relevance.

“The availability of electronic data varies from county to county and from state to state,” said Neu, who works in an automated, data-rich area of Florida. “Large metropolitan areas with sufficient depth of electronic data should be able to generate the necessary title products by using an automated search product in the near future. Abstracting and the intuitive examination process will continue to be a part of commercial transactions for the foreseeable future.”

 

There will always be a need for this skill in the commercial and complicated residential transaction. These matters require a great deal of intuitive thought, which makes it difficult to program the type of logic necessary to automate the process. However, as the availability of electronic data grows, so will the automation of the abstracting function. Completely electronic title reports are already available in some markets — reports that did not require any human intervention other than keying an order in a system. These reports are used for both residential refinances and residential buy/sell transactions.

Jay Sibley, president and CEO of Title Data Inc. in Houston, said no matter how automated abstracting becomes, the title industry will always want a human set of eyes to review what a computer produces.

“When a title company’s checkbook is on the line to any extent, it will want to ensure that the computer didn’t hiccup along the way,” Sibley said. “This set of eyes may belong to an abstractor in Altoona, Pa., or to a resident of Mumbai, India.”

Some abstractors remain bitterly critical of the new technologies. Booth, for instance, adamantly opposes the use of instant title searches, calling the product the most “selfish greedy thing this industry has every done.”

“It’s dangerous and reckless,” he said. “It poses more risk, but it doesn’t matter. If you are making $7 billion and I ask for $2 billion back would you do it? Sure you would because $5 billion is $5 billion.”

Future roll of abstractors

Over the years, the industry has shifted from photostatic copies to dry silver microfilm prints to digital images to paperless transactions. The industry will continue to adapt to new technologies. In the future, abstractors may not be called “abstractors,” rather they may be called upon to provide quality control of automated products and analyze title to complex commercial properties.

 

Booth suggests abstractors start looking at the retail sector because competing with 10-minute commitments for $35 is too difficult. He said abstractors could get into online privacy products and provide information to homebuyers such as “Do you want to know your property’s history or do you want to know if there are claims against your property.”

“Who better to do that stuff than the people who delve into records everyday,” Booth said.

Duncan believes there will be more abstractors closing shop this year as business shifts from refinances and purchases to foreclosures — work that involves more risk and liability. While it doesn’t pay any more than refi and purchase work, it could pay the bills.

“In a foreclosure search, those people’s credit is already shot,” Duncan said. “There will probably be judgments, tax liens and property taxes not paid. You should always concentrate on your judgments, but when doing foreclosures that’s when you pay particular attention to judgments.”

Duncan said his company is exploring possibilities to broaden its offerings, such as imaging and scanning information for title companies. Duncan said he helped develop a system that scans in images. Once they have performed quality control and make sure the image is in the system, the paper documents are shredded.

Another possible avenue is doing title searches for bail bond agents. “When someone is bonded out, people sign over their homes,” Duncan said. “Why not market to them? We haven’t done that yet.”

Abstractors trivialized

Many abstractors are concerned outsourcing work overseas poses problems because someone in a different country won’t know the idiosyncrasies of each geographical location. Someone overseas won’t be able to check the assessment book sitting on a clerk’s desk. “It’s not online, it’s in a three-ring binder,” Booth said. “That’s where you find a $2,000 street assessment. What happens when the new owner gets hit with that bill?”

Prashant Kothari, president of String Real Estate Information Services, defended the impact offshoring has on abstractors. He said technology has played the larger role in minimizing the need for abstractors. Kothari compared the title industry to changes that occurred to travel agents. He said the Internet and the amount of information available online is having the same effect on abstractors.

“It would make sense to centralize the process even if you didn’t have offshoring,” he said. “Offshoring has a minimal impact on abstractors.”

Booth said he testified last year for legislation in Ohio that would put a limit when title policies are issued. Currently, there is no limit in the Buckeye State, whereas Florida’s limit is 90 days and Texas is 60 days after closing. Senate Bill 185 was passed without the legislation Booth campaigned for.

“Some aren’t paying the premiums to their underwriters,” Booth claims. “It opens an incredibly huge door for fraud for ripping off the underwriter.”

Some legislation that recently passed in North Dakota will impact abstractors’ bottom lines. The state’s governor recently signed into law Senate Bill 2217, which limits the amount an abstractor may charge for making and certifying an abstract.

“Everything that a real estate loan is based on is the abstractors’ work, without that work nothing else can happen,” Duncan said. “The real estate market will come to a halt without the abstract — and that’s where you find the title problems, such as releases that haven’t been filed and judgments. A lot of companies on refi transactions are going to a deed report and a credit report. A credit report won’t show a local homeownership lien or it will be delayed on the federal income tax lien because it’s only checked every couple of months. The importance of a title searcher is No. 1. Abstractor work has been trivialized and packaged in a nice little box and they have said ‘that’s all its worth.’“

Expertise still vital

While many are wary of their roles as more data is found online, Brian Twibell, chief executive officer for Red Vision, believes abstractors will continue to play a viable role in the real estate transaction because of the expertise they bring.

His company’s product, TitleVision, is aimed at minimizing the manual effort required to abstract and examine title, such as the less-expert work that generally takes up to 80 percent of an abstractor’s time, Twibell said.

While the platform was designed to minimize the manual effort required to abstract and examine title, it still requires an abstractor or title examiner to validate the online information culled from courthouses, property assessors and tax collector data. The technology looks under the covers for different state statutes and data anomalies, such as the Homestead Exemption in Texas, he said.

“With saving a trip to courthouse, you still have the dichotomy in the type of work that’s performed,” Twibell said. “We’ve been able to get four or five times the work out of one abstractor. We optimize the time an abstractor spends doing the work. In our world, it strikes a nice balance between pricing and quality.”

The Web-based Red Vision hosts its own servers of histories of tax records and appraisals for all of Florida and Maryland, most of Texas and eight counties in Southern California.

Red Vision utilizes its Gainesville, Fla.-based staff to produce deed reports, current owner searches, institutional mortgage reports and full chain reports. Twibell said his company employs about 40 abstractors and has been hiring about three or four abstractors a month the past year.

“It’s acclimating to the new world. The emphasis isn’t how closely domiciled you are to the courthouse anymore,” Twibell said. “We recognize that expertise needs to be utilized for these orders. The nature of the work has changed but the reality is the expertise is still relevant.”

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Helene /GA
1/25/2010 9:00:28 PM (3585 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - george Hubka/MI
1/25/2010 8:35:05 PM (3862 views)
Re: Just say no - J. H./OH
1/25/2010 11:35:02 PM (3579 views)
Re: Just say no - george Hubka/MI
1/26/2010 7:52:52 PM (3643 views)
Re: Just say no - Ron McPherson/IA
1/28/2010 11:02:39 PM (3714 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Alix Ott/MI
2/1/2010 9:03:34 AM (3723 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Phillip Ayres/MI
2/1/2010 10:19:15 AM (3619 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - William Pattison /CA
2/1/2010 11:32:56 AM (3665 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Jessica Talley/NJ
2/1/2010 4:09:45 PM (3615 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - george Hubka/MI
2/1/2010 6:44:53 PM (3608 views)
Re: Lower fees for no tax info w/search - Lisa Yucius/MA
2/3/2010 1:04:04 PM (3545 views)

Title Express - Francine D'Elia Wirsching/PA
1/24/2010 3:23:33 PM (4378 views)

Withdrawn - Nils Nelson/ME
1/24/2010 1:33:42 PM (3512 views)

Curious... - elizabeth reddy/FL
1/22/2010 8:06:50 PM (3781 views)
Re: Curious... - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
1/22/2010 8:22:53 PM (3934 views)
Re: Curious... - elizabeth reddy/FL
1/23/2010 8:02:22 AM (3978 views)
Re: Curious... - P Parrish/AL
1/23/2010 11:48:06 AM (3858 views)
Re: Curious... - Clanci Nelson/OH
1/25/2010 4:03:09 PM (3868 views)
Re: Curious... - george Hubka/MI
1/25/2010 6:29:22 PM (3777 views)
Re: Curious... - elizabeth reddy/FL
1/25/2010 8:04:27 PM (3830 views)
Re: Curious... - george Hubka/MI
1/25/2010 8:27:39 PM (3682 views)
Re: Curious...about posting ettiquette - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
1/25/2010 11:01:48 PM (3633 views)
Re: Curious...about posting ettiquette - K C/NJ
1/26/2010 10:02:27 AM (3761 views)
Re: Curious...about posting ettiquette - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
1/26/2010 6:04:57 PM (3643 views)
Re: Curious...about posting ettiquette - Patrick Scott/IL
1/28/2010 10:08:13 PM (3807 views)
Re: Curious...about posting ettiquette - Sheila Sten/PA
1/29/2010 7:10:11 AM (4137 views)

Tax Search in Yonkers?? - K C/NJ
1/21/2010 2:35:14 PM (3646 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/21/2010 4:08:29 PM (4115 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - K C/NJ
1/21/2010 4:42:13 PM (4027 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/21/2010 5:50:02 PM (3887 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - David Hoechster/NC
1/22/2010 4:36:28 PM (5947 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - K C/NJ
1/22/2010 4:51:57 PM (3965 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - george Hubka/MI
1/23/2010 3:40:35 PM (4020 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/23/2010 10:16:16 PM (3929 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - Clanci Nelson/OH
1/25/2010 3:29:49 PM (3844 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - K C/NJ
1/26/2010 10:06:18 AM (3897 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - Deb Manion/VA
1/26/2010 11:24:43 AM (5848 views)
Re: Tax Search in Yonkers?? - K C/NJ
1/29/2010 8:54:16 AM (3965 views)




ESS Solutions ? - Joe Kalmon/WI
1/20/2010 4:44:41 PM (4082 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - Nils Nelson/ME
1/20/2010 5:07:22 PM (4431 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - K C/NJ
1/20/2010 6:25:49 PM (4280 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - Debbie Olson/WI
1/26/2010 1:50:58 PM (4221 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - K C/NJ
1/27/2010 1:52:16 PM (4269 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - K C/NJ
1/27/2010 2:07:47 PM (6308 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/27/2010 2:36:11 PM (4093 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - K C/NJ
1/27/2010 3:00:55 PM (4278 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - Patrick/NY
1/27/2010 3:17:27 PM (4108 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/27/2010 4:17:37 PM (4288 views)
Re: ESS Solutions ? - george Hubka/MI
1/27/2010 6:36:28 PM (4212 views)

A Question about e+o Coverage - Joe Kalmon/WI
1/20/2010 4:42:59 PM (3797 views)
Re: A Question about e+o Coverage - K C/NJ
1/20/2010 6:35:26 PM (4097 views)
Re: A Question about e+o Coverage - Cheryl Hartzman/PA
1/25/2010 11:05:41 AM (3908 views)
Re: A Question about e+o Coverage - Michelle Hyslope/OK
1/25/2010 11:11:25 AM (4093 views)

"BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - William McAlarney/TN
1/20/2010 2:31:49 PM (3969 views)
Re: "BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - P Parrish/AL
1/20/2010 3:59:30 PM (4188 views)
Re: "BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - Susan McKee Shifflett/WV
1/27/2010 11:16:00 AM (4037 views)
Re: "BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - William McAlarney/TN
1/28/2010 10:28:15 AM (4172 views)
Re: "BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - george Hubka/MI
1/28/2010 2:36:26 PM (4111 views)
Re: "BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - William McAlarney/TN
1/30/2010 8:31:14 AM (4250 views)
Re: "BE AWARE OF KAIMEN ASSOC.INC" - STEVE MEINECKE/TN
2/3/2010 10:27:50 AM (3759 views)

Should an Abstractor ever be liable for more than the amount of a document that was missed? - John Smith/WY
1/16/2010 3:03:45 PM (3893 views)
Re: Should an Abstractor ever be liable for more than the amount of a document that was missed? - Kevin Ahern/CT
1/16/2010 4:02:36 PM (4467 views)
Re: Should an Abstractor ever be liable for more than the amount of a document that was missed? - John Smith/WY
1/17/2010 1:03:37 PM (4201 views)

REO Land Services, Inc. - Dan Zook/NY
1/14/2010 10:03:10 AM (4371 views)
Re: REO Land Services, Inc. - Dan Zook/NY
1/14/2010 10:08:26 AM (4592 views)
Re: REO Land Services, Inc. - Dorothy Payne/NY
1/14/2010 8:25:12 PM (4235 views)
Re: REO Land Services, Inc. - Dan Zook/NY
1/15/2010 10:26:48 AM (4209 views)
Re: REO Land Services, Inc. - Dan Zook/NY
1/19/2010 9:09:02 AM (3965 views)
Re: REO Land Services, Inc. - Mark Pierson/FL
7/26/2010 9:45:23 AM (3706 views)
Re: REO Land Services, Inc. - Nils Nelson/ME
7/26/2010 1:44:21 PM (3668 views)

What would you like to read? - Robert Franco/OH
1/13/2010 12:41:10 PM (3657 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/14/2010 8:54:08 AM (4284 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Helene /GA
1/15/2010 8:19:45 AM (4186 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Alix Ott/MI
1/19/2010 8:57:22 AM (4083 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Robert Franco/OH
1/19/2010 10:00:39 AM (4269 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - george Hubka/MI
1/19/2010 10:48:30 AM (4074 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Dorothy Payne/NY
1/28/2010 12:05:10 AM (4089 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/28/2010 9:04:20 AM (4063 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/28/2010 9:05:35 AM (4125 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - george Hubka/MI
1/28/2010 2:39:37 PM (4219 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - KRISTINE BJORGE/OR
1/19/2010 1:54:07 PM (4060 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - Robert Franco/OH
1/19/2010 2:57:19 PM (4035 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - LORIE LEHMAN/PA
2/15/2010 2:17:00 PM (4132 views)
Re: What would you like to read? - george Hubka/MI
2/15/2010 7:54:49 PM (4469 views)

ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Leigh Attridge/MA
1/13/2010 12:09:37 PM (5680 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Robert Franco/OH
1/13/2010 12:14:07 PM (4743 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Kevin Ahern/CT
1/13/2010 12:56:08 PM (4509 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - NB/LA
1/14/2010 9:24:08 AM (4627 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Helene /GA
1/14/2010 12:11:04 PM (4400 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Joyce Obrien/PA
1/15/2010 11:23:17 PM (4469 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Robert Franco/OH
1/16/2010 11:27:02 AM (4413 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - PHILIP YIANILOS/VA
1/19/2010 6:58:40 AM (4174 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Barbara Sonafelt/PA
1/19/2010 7:11:26 AM (4431 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - HOPE DEZERN/SC
1/19/2010 11:27:28 AM (4403 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Leigh Attridge/MA
1/19/2010 12:06:05 PM (4169 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/19/2010 3:42:27 PM (4261 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Helene/GA
1/20/2010 12:44:24 AM (4154 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - WAYNE QUICK/NC
1/20/2010 10:58:01 AM (4172 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Wanda Steudel/OH
1/20/2010 1:08:43 PM (4304 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - K C/NJ
1/20/2010 3:29:58 PM (4189 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Helene /GA
1/20/2010 9:49:03 PM (4132 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Sheila Sten/PA
1/22/2010 9:29:30 AM (4155 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/22/2010 2:55:36 PM (4108 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Sheila Sten/PA
1/23/2010 5:53:31 PM (4371 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Jessica Talley/NJ
1/23/2010 10:18:01 PM (4341 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - charles jetter/OH
1/25/2010 8:38:42 PM (4186 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - charles jetter/OH
1/25/2010 8:29:56 PM (4211 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - Helene /GA
1/25/2010 9:03:19 PM (4266 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - charles jetter/OH
1/25/2010 7:56:26 PM (4148 views)
Re: ValuAmerica/Urban Settlement - george Hubka/MI
1/25/2010 8:37:57 PM (4419 views)

Kaimen Associates, Inc. - Susan McKee Shifflett/WV
1/12/2010 11:44:52 AM (4845 views)
Re: Kaimen Associates, Inc. - William McAlarney/TN
1/12/2010 2:23:11 PM (4167 views)
Re: Kaimen Associates, Inc. - Susan McKee Shifflett/WV
1/12/2010 4:02:52 PM (4451 views)
Re: Kaimen Associates, Inc. - nita  farrow/FL
1/25/2010 1:59:24 PM (3982 views)
Re: Kaimen Associates, Inc. - David Bay/FL
6/15/2010 6:28:08 AM (3711 views)
Re: Kaimen Associates, Inc. - george Hubka/MI
6/24/2010 9:41:05 PM (3728 views)

National Real Estate - Laurie /MD
1/12/2010 11:20:37 AM (4339 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Laurie /MD
1/12/2010 2:10:21 PM (4236 views)
Re: National Real Estate - researcher ./VA
1/12/2010 4:15:23 PM (4222 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Laurie /MD
1/13/2010 11:03:27 AM (4116 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Kevin Ahern/CT
1/13/2010 11:15:01 AM (4078 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Nils Nelson/ME
1/13/2010 11:21:09 AM (4074 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Nannette/LA
1/14/2010 9:25:51 AM (4045 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Joyce Obrien/PA
1/15/2010 11:35:47 PM (4702 views)
Re: National Real Estate - Susan Parker/TN
3/3/2010 11:45:52 AM (3930 views)

Archives Retrieval Service of Georgia, Inc. - Susan McKee/WV
1/7/2010 4:49:30 PM (4261 views)
Re: Archives Retrieval Service of Georgia, Inc. - Jason Knowles/AL
1/8/2010 9:28:10 AM (4088 views)
Re: Archives Retrieval Service of Georgia, Inc. - Celia Franklin/GA
1/12/2010 9:27:03 AM (3806 views)
Re: Archives Retrieval Service of Georgia, Inc. - GA Title Services/GA
1/14/2010 4:55:46 PM (4087 views)
Re: Archives Retrieval Service of Georgia, Inc. - Russ Frye/GA
1/28/2010 11:13:44 AM (4002 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Explain It Like I’m 5: FIRPTA Edition
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/03
0 comments

Home buyers are more active this fall.....
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2025/11/27
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Purlin and Final Offer Merge to Create Real Estate's First AI Platform Unifying Real Estate, Mortgage, and Title
Purlin®, the AI platform powering enterprise real estate operations, and Final Offer™, the industry's only co...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Application volume was down last week, led by a 14 percent drop in purchase applications. Winter Storm Fern likel...
Home Prices Increased in 73% of Metro Areas in Fourth Quarter of 2025
Home prices rose in 73% of metro markets (168 out of 230) during the fourth quarter of 2025, according to the National A...
NAR Opens Applications for 2026 Good Neighbor Awards
“Service is at the heart of what it means to be a REALTOR®,” said NAR President Kevin Brown. “The...
Advocus National Title Insurance Company Announces Expanded Leadership Team to Support National Growth of Attorney-First Underwriting Platform
Advocus National Title Insurance Company (Advocus), an attorney-focused national title insurance underwriter and industr...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.