Of course it is not in the media... how do you think that the stories of robo-signers and the stories of forged signatures and the stories of back-dated documents got into the media?  Because ordinary people posting on blogs brought it to the media's attention.  But they posted the evidence-- they really did blow the whistle. 

If you've got something, let's have the evidence, and make the wrongdoers household names.  Don't blame me for doubting it; I have a valid reason for doubting any widespread coercion of document signers, for the simple fact that there's no evidence of it!  As it is now, you are giving me nothing to go on but hearsay.  "Paison Recording" returns zero results in Google.  "Jessie" has no last name, and you don't say what the circumstances were regarding the documents that she was forced to sign.  Was this a one-time thing?  Something particular about these certain documents?  If so, then that's something entirely different than what we're talking about here.  We're talking about whether high-volume signers were generally signing under duress.

Sending me doc numbers won't do anything unless you tell the whole story of what's going on in some detail, complete with full names and the correct names of the companies that are engaged in wrongdoing.  If there's a real story here, we will be glad to publish it.

Not meaning to be overly harsh here, but unless you actually put the whistle in your mouth and blow, you're not a whistleblower.