Is anyone seeing any kind of return to "the good old days" when we actually abstracted, examined and then cleared title problems? Although many states and contracts require "marketable title," title underwriters all seem to sanction "insurable title" as a substitute. The norm has become- "let's make little or no effort to find or cure title problems, let's just keep insuring title until the problems go away". Yet we advertise that our claims are low because we are different and we "cure" title problems. Your thoughts?
to post a reply:
login - or -
register