Would this really be a good thing for the title industry? Seems like it could open the door for nuisance suits based on a minimal showing of a violation, ultimately causing title agents to expend attorney fees to defend these types of actions. I agree with the proposition that the legislature needs to create a mechanism for enforcing the rules given the lack of diligence (or resources) from state insurance departments, but this just seems like a can of worms. I know the proponents of this right of action on this blog would use it wisely, but I would be concerned about dirty players in the industry.