Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



I'm not usually this mean, but.... - Alix Ott/MI
8/25/2016 2:57:50 PM (4174 views)
Re: I'm not usually this mean, but.... - Larry Platt/PA
8/26/2016 5:31:15 AM (3079 views)
Re: I'm not usually this mean, but.... - Kimberley Boyd/TX
8/29/2016 11:44:31 AM (2965 views)
Re: I'm not usually this mean, but.... - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
9/6/2016 10:58:09 AM (2790 views)
Re: I'm not usually this mean, but.... - Kelly Alls/GA
9/7/2016 9:55:40 PM (2911 views)

Any insight on I-Net would be appreciated - Terry  Cox/PA
8/24/2016 12:15:00 AM (1743 views)

LUMAR - Saundra  Scott/MD
8/23/2016 7:52:14 PM (2747 views)
Re: LUMAR - Mark Rasnick/OH
8/23/2016 8:20:42 PM (2984 views)
Re: LUMAR - Saundra  Scott/MD
8/24/2016 8:27:37 AM (3009 views)
Re: LUMAR - Lucille Femine/TN
9/6/2016 8:04:06 PM (2891 views)
Re: LUMAR - Saundra  Scott/MD
8/24/2016 8:27:39 AM (2990 views)
Re: LUMAR - Lucille Femine/TN
9/6/2016 7:59:45 PM (2791 views)
Re: LUMAR - Saundra  Scott/MD
9/7/2016 10:40:11 AM (2806 views)
Re: LUMAR - Lucille Femine/TN
9/7/2016 10:46:22 AM (2852 views)
Re: LUMAR - Saundra  Scott/MD
9/7/2016 7:35:15 PM (2799 views)
Re: LUMAR - Lucille Femine/TN
9/8/2016 12:20:43 AM (2802 views)

Abstract providers required background check - Dan Zook/NY
8/22/2016 5:05:36 PM (3016 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Alix Ott/MI
8/23/2016 11:37:21 AM (3280 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Larry Platt/PA
8/26/2016 5:39:17 AM (3328 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Larry Platt/PA
8/24/2016 9:23:06 AM (3250 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Alix Ott/MI
8/24/2016 6:46:57 PM (3203 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Larry Platt/PA
8/25/2016 2:23:59 PM (3184 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Alix Ott/MI
8/25/2016 2:25:49 PM (3153 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Patrick Scott/IL
8/25/2016 4:02:09 PM (3176 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Alix Ott/MI
8/25/2016 4:37:08 PM (3098 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Dan Zook/NY
8/26/2016 12:26:07 PM (3115 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - MICHELLE TURNER/OH
9/19/2016 12:30:44 PM (2755 views)

Patrick is right.  This is becoming more common.  We've had a few clients require this as well.  All of our employees have very thorough background checks run on them prior to hiring.  So it's not an issue for us.  We didn't have to supply results to the client, just signed an affidavit stating we do so.  We also had another client ask for auto insurance info as well for employees that drive company vehicles.  I was in disbelief when I read that.  This is a BIG bank, so they may be required by the government to do that.  Fortunately, that only applies to another department of company.  

However, if a client is wanting us to pay for new background checks on current employees, that would be another situation.  That is when I would negotiate them paying for the background checks. 

Is it worth getting the background check completed? Depends on how badly you want their business.

 

to post a reply: login - or - register


Re: Abstract providers required background check - David Bloys/TX
8/26/2016 12:16:30 PM (3082 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Randi Erickson/MN
8/26/2016 12:26:36 PM (2991 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - David Bloys/TX
8/26/2016 1:13:00 PM (2945 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Randi Erickson/MN
8/26/2016 1:20:14 PM (3075 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - David Bloys/TX
8/26/2016 1:45:13 PM (3015 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Alix Ott/MI
8/26/2016 12:32:35 PM (3036 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - David Bloys/TX
8/26/2016 1:24:21 PM (2931 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Alix Ott/MI
8/26/2016 1:51:08 PM (3023 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - David Bloys/TX
8/26/2016 10:24:49 PM (2995 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - george Hubka/MI
8/26/2016 10:51:42 PM (3057 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Tamara Howard/FL
9/12/2016 8:46:06 AM (2839 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - george Hubka/MI
9/15/2016 8:28:27 PM (2791 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - Rene Blevins/VA
11/2/2016 2:08:57 PM (2638 views)
Re: Abstract providers required background check - george Hubka/MI
11/6/2016 10:10:47 PM (2821 views)

Are Title Plants Still Relevant? - Jeanine Johnson/MN
8/22/2016 3:13:28 PM (4620 views)
Re: Are Title Plants Still Relevant? - Bruce Lutz/PA
8/23/2016 9:59:24 AM (3132 views)
Re: Are Title Plants Still Relevant? - Jeanine Johnson/MN
8/23/2016 1:36:34 PM (2943 views)
Re: Are Title Plants Still Relevant? - Bruce Lutz/PA
8/23/2016 1:59:55 PM (2973 views)




FEES/TURN TIMES - F P/VA
8/19/2016 1:11:23 PM (3101 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - WAYNE QUICK/NC
8/22/2016 8:14:57 AM (2902 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - WAYNE QUICK/NC
8/22/2016 8:15:47 AM (2832 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - Christine Johnson/NC
8/22/2016 9:34:48 AM (2764 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - Kurt deVries/FL
8/22/2016 11:20:02 AM (2814 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - Christine Johnson/NC
8/22/2016 12:08:58 PM (2824 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - Dan Zook/NY
8/22/2016 4:40:29 PM (2753 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - Bruce Lutz/PA
8/23/2016 9:54:51 AM (2804 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - Mark Rasnick/OH
8/23/2016 10:39:16 AM (2704 views)
Re: FEES/TURN TIMES - george Hubka/MI
8/26/2016 11:01:36 PM (2754 views)

Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - Linda Kinlaw/AL
8/19/2016 8:54:26 AM (4311 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - David Bloys/TX
8/19/2016 10:41:01 AM (6282 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - nita  farrow/FL
8/19/2016 12:42:48 PM (3017 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - Arjun Kumar/NY
8/23/2016 11:11:11 AM (2991 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - athira Nithin/DE
8/22/2016 8:51:39 AM (3029 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - Arjun Kumar/NY
8/23/2016 11:13:04 AM (2958 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - athira Nithin/DE
1/4/2017 12:27:25 PM (2657 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - Arjun Kumar/NY
8/23/2016 11:09:42 AM (2881 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - Linda Kinlaw/AL
8/23/2016 12:59:54 PM (3338 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - athira Nithin/DE
1/23/2017 5:24:37 PM (2607 views)
Re: Ever heard of IDOMENT or IDOMANT INC? - REBECCA RIZZONELLI/PA
1/30/2017 7:53:11 AM (2788 views)

Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Leigh Attridge/MA
8/19/2016 7:01:48 AM (2596 views)
Indexing errors - to tell the Clerk or not - Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public/CT
8/19/2016 7:56:08 AM (2925 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Randi Erickson/MN
8/19/2016 9:14:44 AM (2876 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Lu Rivera/PA
8/22/2016 4:09:14 AM (2707 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Robert Newton/MI
8/22/2016 8:51:24 AM (2743 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Randi Erickson/MN
8/22/2016 3:20:01 PM (2634 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Alix Ott/MI
8/23/2016 12:02:09 PM (2691 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Jeanine Johnson/MN
8/22/2016 3:21:30 PM (2709 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - mollie cardell/SC
8/22/2016 10:33:23 AM (2672 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Randi Erickson/MN
8/22/2016 3:24:46 PM (2606 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Leigh Attridge/MA
8/22/2016 8:54:01 PM (2661 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Randi Erickson/MN
8/22/2016 10:11:13 PM (2712 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Leigh Attridge/MA
8/23/2016 6:27:59 AM (2661 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Larry Platt/PA
8/24/2016 9:26:08 AM (2675 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - Miriam Shoaff-Rolles/IN
8/29/2016 7:58:36 AM (2624 views)
Re: Registry indexing errors - to correct or not - MICHELLE TURNER/OH
1/9/2017 12:53:30 PM (2431 views)

www.graystoneonline.com- Debt Collection - Regina  Engebritson/MN
8/15/2016 1:07:52 PM (2320 views)
Re: www.graystoneonline.com- Debt Collection - Dan Zook/NY
8/15/2016 4:11:21 PM (2824 views)
Re: www.graystoneonline.com- Debt Collection - John Baker/OH
8/22/2016 8:49:44 AM (2747 views)
Re: www.graystoneonline.com- Debt Collection - nita  farrow/FL
8/23/2016 12:57:28 PM (2598 views)

Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
8/14/2016 4:47:43 PM (3489 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - WAYNE QUICK/NC
8/15/2016 6:10:08 AM (3131 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Kurt deVries/FL
8/15/2016 10:45:09 AM (3015 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
8/15/2016 11:07:16 AM (2993 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - WAYNE QUICK/NC
8/15/2016 11:25:14 AM (3032 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Christine Johnson/NC
8/15/2016 11:52:17 AM (2957 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
8/15/2016 1:40:20 PM (2940 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - WAYNE QUICK/NC
8/15/2016 1:44:04 PM (3003 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Kurt deVries/FL
8/15/2016 1:12:09 PM (2962 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Alix Ott/MI
8/15/2016 4:40:51 PM (2884 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - george Hubka/MI
8/16/2016 2:08:36 AM (2852 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
8/16/2016 10:46:42 AM (2887 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Nils Nelson/ME
8/16/2016 11:40:12 AM (2832 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - Nils Nelson/ME
8/16/2016 11:40:17 AM (2844 views)
Re: Why are abstractors difficult to work with? - WAYNE QUICK/NC
8/22/2016 8:12:23 AM (2783 views)

SLK Global Non Pay - Anthony BROWNN/VA
8/11/2016 10:59:04 AM (1894 views)

V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Anthony BROWNN/VA
8/11/2016 10:58:28 AM (2447 views)
Re: V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Jason Knowles/AL
8/11/2016 5:43:52 PM (3005 views)
Re: V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - nita  farrow/FL
8/19/2016 12:43:38 PM (2635 views)
Re: V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Jim A/WV
8/11/2016 8:52:23 PM (2932 views)
Re: V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Alix Ott/MI
8/23/2016 12:15:00 PM (2740 views)
Re: V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Crystal Hernandez/OH
8/23/2016 2:46:11 PM (2587 views)
Re: V4 Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Jim A/WV
8/28/2016 7:28:09 PM (2856 views)

V$ Info Tech Solutions Non Pay - Anthony BROWNN/VA
8/11/2016 10:57:35 AM (1613 views)

Knowledge Splice Non Pay - Anthony BROWNN/VA
8/11/2016 10:56:48 AM (2545 views)
Re: Knowledge Splice Non Pay - KIMBERLY  FALCONE/PA
8/15/2016 7:32:53 AM (2990 views)
Re: Knowledge Splice Non Pay - Celeste Yakawonis/ME
8/22/2016 8:48:09 AM (2504 views)
Re: Knowledge Splice Non Pay - Jana Urban-Buzek/OH
1/31/2017 8:33:56 AM (2347 views)
Re: Knowledge Splice Non Pay - Rene Blevins/VA
2/6/2017 9:31:18 AM (2350 views)
Re: Knowledge Splice Non Pay - Jana Urban-Buzek/OH
2/27/2017 11:19:08 AM (2342 views)
Re: Knowledge Splice Non Pay - Melissa Bruner/KS
4/11/2017 12:05:09 PM (2224 views)

Non Payment - Anthony BROWNN/VA
8/11/2016 10:55:52 AM (1858 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8975 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

Beneath Every Closing Lies a Story
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/07/18
0 comments

Residential Appraisers: Reclaim Your Time
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/07/09
0 comments

ATTENTION CIOs, CTOs, VENDOR MANAGERS, AND SUPPLIER MANAGERS
Will Duncan 's Blog
2026/06/15
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

MISMO to Launch FRAME Interactive Workshop, Put AI Governance into Practice
"Everyone is trying to figure out how to use AI effectively, but just as importantly, how to do it responsibly," said MI...
Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Following last week’s spike in oil prices, mortgage rates moved higher, with the 30-year fixed rate increas...
Foreign Buyers Purchased $45.3 Billion Worth of U.S. Homes from April '25 to March '26
“The decline in foreign home buyer activity mirrors the decline in international visitors and tourists to the Unit...
Second Century Ventures Announces 8 Companies for 2026 REACH Commercial Scale-Up Program
Second Century Ventures, the strategic investment arm of the National Association of REALTORS® and the most active ...
New Home Sales Edge Higher as Affordability Challenges Persist
“New home sales are gaining some momentum at the more affordable range of the market, with homes priced below $300...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.