Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Discussion
<< get older messagesget newer messages >>
to post a message: login - or - register | search messages | hide all replies



Background Check - Ted Nilius/MN
9/21/2016 6:00:02 PM (3484 views)
Re: Background Check - Craig Honeker/AZ
9/21/2016 6:15:18 PM (3195 views)
Re: Background Check - rhonda lippencott/TN
10/3/2016 7:31:41 AM (2924 views)
Re: Background Check - rhonda lippencott/TN
10/3/2016 7:31:47 AM (2871 views)
Re: Background Check - Leigh Attridge/MA
9/22/2016 8:07:20 AM (3125 views)
Re: Background Check - Dan Zook/NY
9/22/2016 3:54:51 PM (3387 views)
Re: Background Check - Leigh Attridge/MA
9/22/2016 8:01:30 PM (3089 views)
Re: Background Check - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:46:54 PM (2821 views)
background check - Dan Zook/NY
9/22/2016 3:54:54 PM (3064 views)
Re: Background Check - Nils Nelson/ME
9/23/2016 9:17:28 PM (3423 views)
Re: Background Check - Regina  Engebritson/MN
9/26/2016 12:56:15 PM (3102 views)
Re: Background Check - Bruce Lutz/PA
9/28/2016 11:27:55 PM (3032 views)
Background Checks Spread to Abstractors - Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public/CT
9/29/2016 7:59:12 AM (3146 views)
Re: Background Checks Spread to Abstractors - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:43:02 PM (2871 views)
Re: Background Check - Larry Platt/PA
10/3/2016 8:39:24 AM (2925 views)
Re: Background Check - Beverly Murch/VA
10/3/2016 1:02:50 PM (2892 views)
Re: Background Check - Richard Primmer/RI
10/3/2016 3:32:01 PM (2908 views)
Re: Background Check - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:39:36 PM (3010 views)
Re: Background Check - george Hubka/MI
10/10/2016 7:03:47 AM (3019 views)
Re: Background Check - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:44:44 PM (2953 views)
Re: Background Check - Linda Adams/MI
10/11/2016 11:28:47 AM (2892 views)
Re: Background Check - Randi Erickson/MN
10/15/2016 2:17:58 PM (6007 views)
Re: Background Check - Anthony BROWNN/VA
10/24/2016 10:50:06 AM (2907 views)

I own a national title company. I hire abstractors and notaries all the time. I have not had one lender ever ask who is closing my loan or to provide background checks or who did the search. All they want to see is a copy of my E & O policy and a copy of my title license. I also get calls and emails daily from signing companies telling me if I use them, they will take care of making sure that all notaries have a background check annually. This is a sales technique, a way for companies to make more money at your expense and it is not required by any state or government agency which I tell them is not required so using them actually costs me more money than going right to you the notary and cutting them out. ALTA came out with ALTAs Best Practices and they ( Mostly the salesmen for the companies that provide the services to insure compliance with best practices )have been trying to convince everyone that their ideas are the law. ALTA is a trade association and they do not have the ability to force its ideas on state, federal, or local governments, Banks, Lenders, Mortgage companies, Signing agents, Notary's, Abstractors, Title companies or any other private business. Here is the bottom line.  It is not required and I tell them no. The funny thing is they all still use me and they will use you too. What is better, to use a notary or abstractor for ten years with no claims or to use a notary or abstractor with a current background check who may not even know how to do their jobs. Stand your ground and choose to not believe the goods they are selling. Look at your bottom line. Do they really know how many employees you have?, do they really know who is doing the work? This is the problem with the whole system. I can hire anyone that has credentials but in the end, I have no idea who did the work and they won't either. I am a current member of ALTA and I am not against them or their ideas or thoughts but please also remember that half of the board and 95% of their money comes from underwriters so the lobby and employees are going to be for those that support their families or pay checks. It is in an underwriters best interest to make you do these things as it reduces their liability for claims which at least makes sense from an underwriters prospective. We also know that all the underwriters off shore work to India as they contact me daily begging me to send them work and do not follow the same rules they want us to follow. This creates an unfair advantage, first they will work for pennies on the dollar, then they can bypass all of the state and federal rules as they work in another county. How can you sue someone who works online from home in India for breaking US law when they never stepped foot in our county all over a $10 current owner title search? All the info we see as abstractors is public info online available to anyone. I could see some liability as to personal private financial info for a licensed notary but please keep in mind that the state that regulates that has already done a background check or you would not be a notary. Now your being told that the state background check and process is not acceptable? I have also noticed that the underwriters are buying up all of the business that provide these services in an effort to gain profit. In the end, if a client picks my company to handle their settlement, I already follow every state and federal law and the lender is off the hook as they did not send any business to me and the client has a legal right to pick whoever they want to handle their settlement. When I get audited, I am asked what I am doing to follow Best Practices by my underwriter. My answer is, I am doing nothing as it is not required by any state or federal agency and then I am told by them that it is coming. . I let them know that if they are not happy that I get calls from underwriters almost daily asking me to transfer my business to them. The bottom line is this. I mail in checks daily to them and they make money on me and there is really very little liability on them. I go and find the clients, I do the work, they really only insure for title errors and if it would be my fault or the fault of a vendor of mine if we make an error or break a law or rule, they file a claim against my E & O policy so they do not pay the claim if it is my fault. If I were to break a law or rule, my assumption is that I would be liable and they would sue not the underwriter as they have nothing to do with my opperation other than allow me to mail them checks and sell their title insurance. I hope this helps put this issue of background checks to rest as it is really not debatable. The last thing on this topic is this. If a client sends you alot of business and you are scared of losing that business, look at how much work they send you and then deceide if the cost to comply with their request is justified. Will you still make a profit? You can also tell them you will but you will have to raise the cost to compy and pass the cost along to them. How much to do bet if you raise your price, the orders go down? This means they want you to work for less really and reduce their risk of potential claims which is really non exsistant. Lastly, I reccoment that you join a land title association and keep watch on what is going on so you will be informed and can work against or for an item it if you believe that this is not or for your best interest. You have a voice so make sure you let your congress state and federal representives know what you want and do not want. If noone oppose's an item, it is easy to get support in congress. If they get alot of calls against something, they will not vote for it unless they get alot of money from a lobby to support it but in the end, they need to be re-elected so your voice can kill a potential bill. Please also know that at present the CFPB has been ruled unconstitional. It was the only govenment agency that made 100% of its funding from finding fault with those that it governed which I believe is unfair as they need to increase regulation so they can get paid. I think you can agree that there are those who do break the rules and need to be dealt with but if it is important to the people, then provide the money needed to support the agenct so that its funding does not come from those it governs as this seems unfair. God Bless, Keep your head up and continue to do the good work you do. Where would any state of national title company be with out you. They cannot do it without YOU, never underestimate your value.

to post a reply: login - or - register


ALTA Required : Background Checks - Joseph Hirsch, 3rd/PA
10/17/2016 10:34:15 AM (2957 views)

American Documents and Title - Jason Knowles/AL
9/21/2016 10:22:19 AM (3126 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - Larry Platt/PA
10/3/2016 8:42:20 AM (2938 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - Andrew Spirito/RI
10/3/2016 7:17:22 PM (3059 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - Jason Knowles/AL
10/4/2016 5:02:22 PM (2846 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - george Hubka/MI
10/10/2016 7:05:35 AM (2777 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - Amber Binick/MD
11/4/2016 2:39:01 PM (2608 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - Jason Knowles/AL
11/4/2016 2:40:14 PM (2677 views)
Re: American Documents and Title - george Hubka/MI
11/6/2016 10:08:21 PM (2613 views)

NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - Daryl Golinski/PA
9/19/2016 6:52:38 PM (12564 views)
Re: NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - Carlyle Millard/WV
9/26/2016 8:34:21 AM (2956 views)
Re: NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - Daryl Golinski/PA
9/26/2016 9:34:02 AM (3151 views)
Re: NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - Anita DeWitt/PA
9/26/2016 6:25:42 PM (3188 views)
Re: NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - Steven Barkate/LA
3/27/2017 5:54:30 PM (2662 views)
Re: NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - Larry Platt/PA
10/3/2016 8:49:37 AM (2798 views)
Re: NON PAY-COAL VALLEY RESEARCH & ABSTRACT-DANIEL WHITTED-NON PAY - John Leasure/OR
10/3/2016 10:11:12 AM (2952 views)

Indus Abstract Services LLC - Russ  Kern/GA
9/15/2016 3:46:36 PM (2845 views)
Re: Indus Abstract Services LLC - Allen Bruce/OH
9/16/2016 7:31:13 AM (3402 views)
Re: Indus Abstract Services LLC - Russ  Kern/GA
9/16/2016 7:35:04 AM (3502 views)

Now hiring in New York - Dan Zook/NY
9/15/2016 1:30:45 PM (2621 views)
Re: Now hiring in New York - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
9/16/2016 9:34:48 AM (2778 views)
Re: Now hiring in New York - Dan Zook/NY
9/16/2016 10:06:36 AM (2843 views)
Re: Now hiring in New York - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
9/16/2016 11:45:47 AM (2814 views)
Re: Now hiring in New York - Mike Anderson/NY
11/22/2016 3:39:55 PM (2519 views)




Servicelink - Chris Hohenfels/VA
9/15/2016 6:42:30 AM (4269 views)
Re: Servicelink - Russ  Kern/GA
9/15/2016 3:49:28 PM (3827 views)
Re: Servicelink - george Hubka/MI
9/15/2016 8:20:08 PM (3581 views)
Re: Servicelink - John Rawlings/WI
9/19/2016 9:58:36 AM (3436 views)
Re: Servicelink - george Hubka/MI
9/19/2016 9:38:33 PM (3428 views)
Re: Servicelink - Judy Maclauchlan/LA
9/21/2016 10:27:06 AM (3330 views)
Re: Servicelink - Roberta Dean/IN
9/22/2016 3:29:59 PM (3261 views)
Re: Servicelink - Kenneth Signor/SC
9/26/2016 5:20:24 AM (3254 views)
Re: Servicelink - John Baker/OH
9/26/2016 8:31:29 AM (3169 views)
Re: Servicelink - Christine Johnson/NC
9/26/2016 3:38:37 PM (3188 views)
Re: Servicelink - Nancy Noblitt/AL
9/26/2016 7:37:04 PM (3087 views)
Re: Servicelink - Bruce Lutz/PA
9/28/2016 11:08:11 PM (3118 views)
Re: Servicelink/Background check - WAYNE QUICK/NC
10/3/2016 7:55:53 AM (3097 views)
Re: Servicelink/Background check - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:51:47 PM (2927 views)
Re: Servicelink/Background check - WAYNE QUICK/NC
10/3/2016 5:31:01 PM (3039 views)
Re: Servicelink/Background check - Judy Maclauchlan/LA
10/4/2016 11:38:26 AM (3092 views)
Re: Servicelink - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:55:06 PM (3008 views)
Re: Servicelink - george Hubka/MI
10/10/2016 10:13:35 PM (2873 views)

Comment on "Black Kinight: Purchase Mortgage Volume Highest Since 2007" - Source of Title/OH
9/13/2016 9:32:28 PM (2860 views)
Notary Public/Signing Agent - Thelma Perry/MI
9/13/2016 9:32:28 PM (4292 views)
Re: Notary Public/Signing Agent - Kurt deVries/FL
9/14/2016 11:56:55 AM (4288 views)
Re: Comment on "Black Kinight: Purchase Mortgage Volume Highest Since 2007" - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:56:15 PM (3903 views)

Workload - J Cohlmeyer/OH
9/13/2016 10:51:47 AM (3017 views)
Re: Workload - sharon tornes/MN
9/18/2016 1:05:28 PM (3055 views)
Re: Workload - J Cohlmeyer/OH
9/19/2016 12:57:56 PM (2933 views)
Re: Workload - WAYNE QUICK/NC
9/19/2016 6:23:59 AM (2805 views)
Two generations of feast or famine - Bobbi Shorthouse, Notary Public/CT
9/19/2016 7:47:12 AM (2898 views)
Re: Two generations of feast or famine - J Cohlmeyer/OH
9/19/2016 1:03:08 PM (2881 views)
Re: Workload - Regina  Engebritson/MN
9/19/2016 11:09:24 AM (2719 views)
Re: Workload - Larry Platt/PA
10/3/2016 8:51:16 AM (2660 views)
Re: Workload - Garret  Fitzgerald/VA
10/3/2016 4:57:12 PM (2653 views)

Nova Business Capital - Austin Whitaker/NJ
9/12/2016 1:51:28 PM (2475 views)
Re: Nova Business Capital - Kurt deVries/FL
9/12/2016 2:16:52 PM (2816 views)
Re: Nova Business Capital - A-K ./CO
9/18/2016 9:30:18 PM (2642 views)

Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - Carol Clark/NY
9/12/2016 11:37:23 AM (4201 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - Deborah Zitelli/PA
9/12/2016 3:38:12 PM (3137 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - Carol Clark/NY
9/12/2016 6:37:44 PM (3122 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - Kurt deVries/FL
9/13/2016 10:00:53 AM (3042 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - Rene Blevins/VA
9/19/2016 9:23:26 AM (2908 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - mollie cardell/SC
9/19/2016 12:17:57 PM (2763 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - Ardenmine Solutions/AK
12/6/2016 3:40:10 PM (2743 views)
Re: Vanguard Holdings, L.L.C. - mollie cardell/SC
12/7/2016 8:17:44 AM (2707 views)

OK...so I'm mean..... - Alix Ott/MI
9/12/2016 10:17:21 AM (2896 views)
Re: OK...so I'm mean..... - David Bloys/TX
9/12/2016 6:54:47 PM (2844 views)
Re: OK...so I'm mean..... - Alix Ott/MI
9/12/2016 9:25:09 PM (2822 views)
Re: OK...so I'm mean..... - David Bloys/TX
9/13/2016 7:08:20 AM (2717 views)
Re: OK...so I'm mean..... - Alix Ott/MI
9/13/2016 7:15:23 AM (2737 views)
Re: OK...so I'm mean..... - Patrick Scott/IL
9/13/2016 6:51:13 PM (2711 views)
Re: OK...so I'm mean..... - Alix Ott/MI
9/13/2016 6:53:58 PM (2688 views)

Westcor for AZ (update) - Don (Chunshen) Li/FL
9/9/2016 1:46:09 PM (1728 views)

US Title Solutions - Opinions? - Douglas  McEvoy/KY
9/8/2016 2:44:07 PM (2678 views)
Re: US Title Solutions - Opinions? - Jim Basgier/VA
9/12/2016 4:41:38 AM (2753 views)
Re: US Title Solutions - Opinions? - Daniel Silverburg/CA
9/12/2016 8:05:01 AM (2789 views)
Re: US Title Solutions - Opinions? - Douglas  McEvoy/KY
9/13/2016 12:44:47 PM (2598 views)

County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
8/29/2016 4:39:03 PM (2710 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - george Hubka/MI
9/6/2016 6:19:24 AM (2603 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Constance Foye/VA
9/6/2016 11:17:46 AM (2652 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Mark Rasnick/OH
9/6/2016 11:31:12 AM (2573 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
9/6/2016 11:38:58 AM (2492 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Constance Foye/VA
9/6/2016 11:47:11 AM (2526 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
9/6/2016 11:56:43 AM (2675 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Mark Rasnick/OH
9/6/2016 12:21:27 PM (2547 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
9/6/2016 12:32:55 PM (2536 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
9/6/2016 12:42:09 PM (2624 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - sharon tornes/MN
9/6/2016 9:15:45 PM (2450 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
9/6/2016 11:12:44 PM (2540 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - Randi Erickson/MN
9/6/2016 11:28:17 PM (2555 views)
Re: County Competition and their NON-PROFIT STATUS - george Hubka/MI
9/9/2016 11:49:59 PM (2460 views)

Macon LLC - John Baker/OH
8/26/2016 2:04:16 PM (2553 views)
Re: Macon LLC - Alwin Wood/DC
8/26/2016 3:09:19 PM (2926 views)


<< get older messagesget newer messages >>

DISCLAIMER: These Message Forums are un-moderated and Source of Title does not endorse the content of any of the posts. Source of Title discourages libelous comments and you, as the sole creator of the content, take full responsibility for your remarks.
Directory

The Source of Title Business directory has 8961 listed companies.

Leave feedback on a company:
SOT ID #:  learn more...
DRN Title Search
Blogs

Read other users' blogs-- or start your own!

Most Recent Blog Posts:

What Is Title Insurance & Benefits
Michael Stelzer's Blog
2026/03/14
0 comments

The Source of Title - Part I: Freedom Written, Freedom Insured
Ben DuBay's Blog
2026/02/15
0 comments

Shared Driveway Agreements
Marissa Berends's Blog
2025/12/10
0 comments

Articles

Source of Title articles help to keep you informed on the state of the title industry.

Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
“Financial markets were volatile last week amid the ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. Mortgage rates increased o...
NAR Statement on President Trump's Executive Order on Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Home Construction
“America’s housing affordability crisis is fundamentally a supply problem, and solving it requires removing ...
NAR Applauds Senate Passage of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act
“It has been nearly two decades since Congress last enacted a sweeping, bipartisan housing law. The Housing and Ec...
Single-Family Starts Remain Soft in January on Affordability Concerns
“The single-family market has slowed as builders continue to deal with elevated construction costs while affordabi...
Propy Brings Agentic AI to Institutional Real Estate with Its Third Acquisition: Boss Law in Florida
"We're excited to expand into the institutional market, where large real estate operators need infrastructure that can s...

Search Articles:
browse...

Classifieds

Buy, sell, or trade! Browse the ads or post your own!

© 2020, Source of Title.