DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Joseph Grabiel's Blog

I remember when . . .
by Joseph Grabiel | 2010/08/23 |

To examine in a county Recorder's Office you had to meet certain requirements.

Joseph Grabiel's Blog ::

Reminding you this is the early 1970's. There were plenty of men's clothing stores, and even more numerous were the women's stores. Small towns had entire stores selling nothing but shoes! So, the economy was not yet big box retailing. Something else, most if not all law school graduates were male. For whatever reason, women just had not chosen law as a career. To be considered for a position with a title company, usually there was an attorney somewhere near the process. Either it was their law firm who sponsored the title company, the lawyer did titles for a living, or the attorney played a significant role in the output. Whichever it was, there was a certain standard set for examiners. Many, although far from being attorneys, felt the professionalism and carried it with them to work. Many firms would not hire an individual unless they had first become part of a law school program - even if the student was expressly interested in becoming a prosecutor. True, moreso than now, most record rooms were dusty affairs. Still, it was a professional position and work - and a person should not come to work dressed inappropriately. Dresses or skirts with hose were a pretty standard thing for women. T-shirts and tank tops, blue jeans and Nike's did not become popular in the work world until the later 1980's. Office workers in D.C. sort of began the liberalization of dress codes, and it spread. Soon, blue jeans and running shoes were common - with a tie and dress shirt. That has given way. As 'short-form' searches became the standard, the requirement of being some kind of a college graduate fell by the wayside. A blue collar mentality grew. Dress codes slackened and disappeared. True, if it is work, then the clothes worn to perform that work are - by definition - work clothes. So, skin tight or shaggy, soiled or shiny, it came to work with the 'worker'. The new uniform was a non-uniform. Ties left, then button down collars, then dress trousers, and leather shoes. Women's attire left the dress at the cleaner, the hair in rollers, and the midriff bare and pierced. Tattoos appeared - mostly on women! Make up became the functional minimum - almost never lipstick. After all, there is a ladder to be climbed, and that is work! Maybe this is one reason why E & O Insurance now is required to examine or abstract, certification tests have been developed for examining and abstracting, and mortgage companies have come under fire to strengthen their procedures. These days you really can not tell what a person does by what they wear to work (FedEx and McDonald's employees excepted).




Rating: 

625 words | 1783 views | 3 comments | log in or register to post a comment


Really?

Maybe this is one reason why E & O Insurance now is required to examine or abstract, certification tests have been developed for examining and abstracting, and mortgage companies have come under fire to strengthen their procedures.

Really?  I have seen no evidence of this around here.  In fact, quite the opposite.  I remember when there were a lot of abstractors who were attorneys, or at least paralegals.  Now it seems all you need is a pen and paper and you can call yourself an abstractor.  We seem to have many more unqualified abstractors than ever.

 
by Robert Franco | 2010/08/23 | log in or register to post a reply

I remember

Although I started in the late 70s during the last major foreclosure "boom" (and this one is by far much much worse), I remember dressing professionally for work in a law office.  It was dress for success times and I feel, as Joseph said, it put your mind in a whole other place - professinalsim and pride in your work output.  It has only been in the past year that I have given up wearing a suit and my stilletos to go and do a search, since many of the Recorders' Offices, at least for the older documents (am doing an awful lot of 60 - 100 year searches since there are so many problems that were never cleared from the records), I would have to remove those heels to get to the places those documents are stored.  I still wear a skirt or dress, unless the cold cold Minnesota winters force me into a pair of dress slacks.  I see no one else in any Recorders' Office dressed, not even the ones I know are attorneys and I do get some strange looks when I enter the record room.  I started in my late teens in this profession and was taught by an attorney who graduated law school in 1940 and, yes, it was a male dominated profession.  To date myself even further, this attorney was so strict that if there was a spot of "white out" on a page (yes, we typed things back then without spell check), it was ripped up in front of us and the page was retyped.  Attention to details of every kind was insisted upon, since it was professional pride not to make a "human" mistake.  In the years that have passed, I have taught many people and passed on this "professional pride" and neuosis to detail.  It is frustrating to me that, as Robert stated, any one with a pad and pencil seems to be an "abstractor".  I see them all the time in the record rooms throughout MN and WI.  It is sad that too many underwriters signed anyone "who could fog up a mirror" as long as they brought in major cash flow.  One would think that lessons were learned in the 80s when a major underwriter (in fact, one of the FIRST title underwriters) had to merge with another to even stay in the title business.  In this age of impersonal and bottom line only mentality, us dinosaurs still have "professional pride" in their work product, but the clients only care about turn time, not accuracy.  Very sad. 

 
by Anita Backlund | 2010/08/23 | log in or register to post a reply

I remember

Like Anita, I started learning abstracting from an attorney I was dating at the time, who specialized in loan closings, including the abstracting and title insurance.  Thank God, he taught me well.  He is still doing this, as am I.  In fact, I really started performing title searches/abstracts on a more frequent basis in the last 5 years. 

Yes, like Anita, I am seeing more and more "abstractors" who do not understand the law performing this work.  God save us all.  I am so particular in my searches that many abstractors I see at the Courthouse, ask me why my abstracts/title searches take so long.  Why don't I just perform a 40-year search like everyone else.  Well, the answer is because I want the title tied into a neat little ribbon, with no glitches. 

Since I have been doing this for so long, I know what old subdivisions still have restrictions.  I know that there are old easements on lake property that would only show up on a 75 year search (this goes for the subdivisions as well.)  If I receive a back title policy missing such information, I must go back further.

We must be professionals in our business.  Granted, I do not wear heels, skirts or suits to the Courthouse.  I stopped that when my clothes would become so dirty that I would wear them once and have to have them dry cleaned.  But, I do not have tattoos, nor do I wear jeans and tee-shirts.

Donna

 
by Donna McCullough | 2010/09/02 | log in or register to post a reply
Joseph Grabiel's Blog

 

Links

Recent Comments

Like Anita, I started learning abstracting from an attorney I was dating at the time, who specialize...
by Donna McCullough
Although I started in the late 70s during the last major foreclosure "boom" (and this one ...
by Anita Backlund
Maybe this is one reason why E & O Insurance now is required to examine or abstract, certifica...
by Robert Franco
Categories

     
    © 2020, Source of Title.