AbstractorPro (Real Title Services)
DRN Title Search
Register
Log In
Forget your Password?

Home
Directory
Bulletins
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Links
Classifieds
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
FAQ
Privacy Policy


Source of Title Blog

Ohio Bill Will Modify Transfer On Death Statutes
by Robert Franco | 2009/11/03 |

The transfer on death designation is a relatively new concept in Ohio real estate law.  It provides a powerful estate planning tool, but the Ohio law is rather specific and limiting.  In a May 2007 blog, Avoid The Use of the Transfer on Death Deed, I pointed out what can happen when the transfer on death interest is not properly created.  The current Ohio law is a trap for the unwary.  Proposed Senate Bill 124 will broaden the transfer on death statutes and remove some of the pitfalls associated with creating transfer on death beneficiary interests. 

Source of Title Blog ::

Bender's Ohio Real Estate Transactions says:

Strategic Point: Avoid use of the transfer on death deed. Of all the matters that have raised unresolved legal questions in the past years among real estate attorneys, the transfer on death deed continues to lead the pack.

The current law states:

Any person who, under the Revised Code or the common law of this state, owns real property or any interest in real property as a sole owner or as a tenant in common may create an interest in the real property transferable on death by executing and recording a deed as provided in this section conveying the person’s entire, separate interest in the real property to one or more individuals, including the grantor, and designating one or more other persons, identified in the deed by name, as transfer on death beneficiaries. 

There are two very important limitations on the creation of transfer on death interests contained in the current statute.  First, only a person who is the sole owner or an owner who holds title as a tenant in common with others may create such an interest.  And, second, the interest must include the person's entire separate interest.

This may be less than intuitive for some.  Certainly, survivorship vesting is very common today.  A husband and wife may hold title as joint tenants with rights of survivorship so that upon the death of one spouse, the real property will pass outside of probate to the survivor.  But, what happens if they pass simultaneously? 

In Ohio, if persons die within 120 hours of each other, they are each deemed to have predeceased the other.  In such case, the property would become property of the parties' respective probate estates.  Because current Ohio law does not permit a person who holds title with rights of survivorship to create a transfer on death interest, this result cannot be avoided with a transfer on death deed.

S.B. 124, however, will specifically permit survivorship tenants to designate a transfer on death beneficiary.

If an individual who owns real property or an interest in real property as a survivorship tenant executes a transfer on death designation affidavit, upon the death of that individual or of one but not all of the surviving survivorship tenants, title to the real property or interest in the real property specified in the affidavit vests in the surviving survivorship tenant or tenants. Upon the death of the last surviving survivorship tenant, title to the real property or interest in the real property vests in the transfer on death beneficiary or beneficiaries designated in the affidavit, subject to division (B)(7) of section 5302.23 of the Revised Code.

This will permit survivorship tenants to designate a transfer on death beneficiary who will take title, outside of probate, upon the passing of the last survivorship tenant.  Problem solved!

Of course, this seems to create another strange result.  If A and B hold title as survivorship tenants and only A designates a transfer on death beneficiary and A predeceases B, this section would seem to only pass a life estate interest to B in A's interest in the property, with the transfer on death beneficiary holding a vested remainder. This follows from the language in the statute that says "upon the death of the last surviving survivorship tenant, title to the real property or interest in the real property vests in the transfer on death beneficiary or beneficiaries designated."  But, this would seem contrary to the section that states "a person designated as a transfer on death beneficiary has no interest in the real property until the death of the owner of the interest."

This problem is handled in ORC 5302.23(B)(7), which "automatically terminates and nullifies any transfer on death beneficiary designations made solely by the deceased survivorship tenant or tenants without joinder by the last surviving survivorship tenant."

Thus, it would appear that in such a scenario, where only A designates a transfer on death beneficiary, such designation would be valid if B predeceases A, but if B is the survivor, the transfer on death designation is terminated. This is a logical result.

Interestingly, S.B. 124 also contains a provision that allows a person to designate less than his entire interest as transferable on death. It also changes the procedure for creating a transfer on death interest.  Rather than by deed, as the current statute provides, S.B. 124 provides that the interest shall be created by affidavit.  The affidavit requires a description of the property, the specific interest to be transferred if it is to be less than the entire interest, a statement by the individual executing the affidavit that he is the record owner of the property, and if the owner is married the affidavit must include a statement by the owner's spouse subordinating the spouse's dower interest.

These changes, should the bill pass, will allow greater flexibility in estate planning and allow more people to take advantage of the transfer on death statutes without some of the inherent pitfalls of the current legislation.

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE




Rating: 

Categories: Ohio Legislation

1400 words | 10305 views | 7 comments | log in or register to post a comment


Transfer on Death

I've only made a quick read of the new statute, so I am not too clear on one issue.  That would be the effect on TODs done under the old statue that did not conform, as in survivorship or unequal distribution.  Does your read give you the impression that those TODs would now be ok retroactively under the new statute?

If not, I see an interesting issue down the road when we are examining title and find a TOD that is fine under the new rules, but was not effective under the '02 legislation.  It would be another of those small gaps in time that we would have to look at our date charts to determine the effect of the instument.  I suppose the change to an affidavit, rather than a deed will always give us a clue.  Other than that question, I like the changes in general.

 
by Douglas Gallant | 2009/11/03 | log in or register to post a reply

Good question...

The statute doesn't seem to address that concern.  A literal reading of the statute would lead me to believe that it would not save improperly prepared transfer on death deeds because they would not have been created under the rules of the new statute, by affidavit.  That does seem to lead to a silly result though... perhaps that is something the legislature should address.

 
by Robert Franco | 2009/11/04 | log in or register to post a reply

Can the surviving tenant change the transfer on death beneficiary?

Robert,

What about this scenario:

A and B hold title as JTROS, TOD to C.

Assume the deed was properly executed after the passage and effective date of the proposed legislation.  Can the surviving titleholder (A or B) execute a new deed naming a different TOD beneficiary?  Is there some type of testamentary expectancy that would preclude this? It would seem akin to changing someone's will after they are dead. Does the "vesting" language properly and clearly address this issue?

Looks like a bar exam question, doesn't it?

 
by J. H. | 2009/11/06 | log in or register to post a reply

Surviving Tenant

I should probably leave this to Robert, but I think it is covered pretty clearly.  Sec 5302.23 B (5) addresses the scenario presented.  It allows the surviving tenant to execute a new TOD affidavit naming new beneficiaries.

 
by Douglas Gallant | 2009/11/07 | log in or register to post a reply

I agree...

They even thought of that scenario.  Just like the old statute, the new one also provides that the TOD beneficiary has no interest in the property until the death of the owner.  It also permits the owner, or surviving survivorship tenants, to revoke or change the beneficiary at any time without the beneficiary's consent. 

It does seem a little strange that after someone who designated a TOD beneficiary dies, someone else could revoke or change the decedant's selection.  But, when you try to marry two concepts like survivorship and TOD, one of them had to trump the other and I think the legislature made a logical choice. 

That would make a great bar exam question!

 
by Robert Franco | 2009/11/07 | log in or register to post a reply

Thanks!

Thanks Doug and Robert.  Sounds like I should have read the statute before asking the question. I think before I have any client execute a JTROS with a TOD designation, I would have both titleholders sign a written statement that they understand that provision, just to C M A and avoid headaches with a potential litigious heir.

 
by J. H. | 2009/11/07 | log in or register to post a reply

Other TOD issues

When assets pass directly to beneficiaries  there is often no fund to pay taxes, debts, and expenses, particularly if the beneficiaries object to kicking in.  There is a great danger that inheritance taxes will not be paid on the real property since the TOD beneficiaries will not do anything until the property is sold, which may be years in the future. TOD may avoid probate, but often results in bad unintended consequences.  Often the will & TOD designations do not agree.  Avoiding probate in this way can result in litigation which then involves the employment of 2 or 3 more lawyers than probate.  So maybe TOD is not such a bad thing after all. 

 

 
by Arthur Rosenbaum | 2009/11/09 | log in or register to post a reply
Source of Title Blog

Robert A. FrancoThe focus of this blog will be on sharing my thoughts and concerns related to the small title agents and abstractors. The industry has changed dramatically over the past ten years and I believe that we are just seeing the beginning. As the evolution continues, what will become of the many small independent title professionals who have long been the cornerstone of the industry?

Robert A. Franco
SOURCE OF TITLE

 

Links

Recommended Blogs Recommended Posts Source of Title Services
Recent Comments

I think there is a problem with doing this. R.C. 5302.23(B)(6) states as follows:"A fee simple title...
by Keith Barton
Appreciate the update Robert. I am curious if there was any discussion of GIS and Parcel IDs. I was ...
by Jeanine Johnson
I am looking for someone in CA to help...
by Kathy Stewart
I am not independent, but I am a title abstractor for a small law firm in NC that deals with Real Es...
by Ashley Bonds
I've thought further of who will be affected by block chain and it won't just be lawyers, title sear...
by Carol Clark
I recently attempted to have a title company examiner sign and notarize (acknowledgement of her sign...
by DANDAN ZHU
 Thank you for the reminder to check for that notation about homestead exemption ending on the ...
by stephen willard
Pat was one of the sweetest men I've ever had the pleasure of knowing.  At every conference he ...
by Douglas Gallant
Categories

 
© 2020, Source of Title.